2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are overconfident CEOs better leaders? Evidence from stakeholder commitments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first dependent variable, for H1, is Departure of valuable employees . As comprehensive data on the firm‐level turnover of employees is not publicly available, we followed existing research (Babenko & Sen, 2014; Carter & Lynch, 2004; Phua, Tham, & Wei, 2018) and used the rate of employee stock option cancellations, forfeitures, and expirations to capture this variable. Stock options are a common form of employee compensation in public U.S. companies to incentivize employees and align interest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first dependent variable, for H1, is Departure of valuable employees . As comprehensive data on the firm‐level turnover of employees is not publicly available, we followed existing research (Babenko & Sen, 2014; Carter & Lynch, 2004; Phua, Tham, & Wei, 2018) and used the rate of employee stock option cancellations, forfeitures, and expirations to capture this variable. Stock options are a common form of employee compensation in public U.S. companies to incentivize employees and align interest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study also contributes to the managerial overconfidence literature. Existing literature has primarily focused on investment (Malmendier and Tate (2005), 2008 commitments (Phua et al (2018)). Less is known, however, about the effect of managerial overconfidence on firm's cash policy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the convention in the literature, we use a R&D-based RSI measure, Sup_RSI, as a proxy for supplier commitment, because RSIs typically include elements and characteristics that are specific to a particular relationship and may be of little value or use outside the relationship (Dass et al, 2015;Kale & Shahrur, 2007;Phua et al, 2018;Raman & Shahrur, 2008). Sup_RSI is constructed using the product of the supplier's R&D expenditure and the fraction of its total annual sales to its major customer, which is then scaled by total assets of the supplier, and finally multiplied by 1,000.…”
Section: Supplier Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Industry fixed effects are based on two-digit SIC codes. Standard errors are clustered at the customer-year level following Phua et al (2018).…”
Section: Baseline Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%