2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are oral fluid testing devices effective for the roadside detection of recent cannabis use? A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Effective “roadside” testing methods for cannabis impairment remain subject to controversy, since they continue to struggle with imprecision due to the pharmacological nature of cannabinoids i.e. uncertainty about the relationship between measured THC and active host impairment (Dobri et al, 2019; Ginsburg, 2019). The fundamentals of and different options for effective intervention strategies for targeting cannabis-impaired driving have not yet been developed (e.g., better social or educational strategies) or are lagging in implementation (e.g., widespread roadside-based testing).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective “roadside” testing methods for cannabis impairment remain subject to controversy, since they continue to struggle with imprecision due to the pharmacological nature of cannabinoids i.e. uncertainty about the relationship between measured THC and active host impairment (Dobri et al, 2019; Ginsburg, 2019). The fundamentals of and different options for effective intervention strategies for targeting cannabis-impaired driving have not yet been developed (e.g., better social or educational strategies) or are lagging in implementation (e.g., widespread roadside-based testing).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the qualitative confirmation analysis for THC and CBD on DOFS can occur concomitantly with the quantitative analysis for other drugs of abuse (Gorziza et al 2020 ), in a single extraction method and detection instrument. Thus, when analyzing immunochromatographic screening tests, often used for roadside drug detection, there is a great variability, particularly for THC, concerning its cut-offs values, sensibility, specificity and accuracy, between different devices brands (Dobri et al 2019 ). Therefore, insufficient oral fluid volume, device usability (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection in saliva would be preferred, as it is non-invasive and simple compared to detection in blood. The concentration of Δ 9 -THC in saliva is a function of the time since the cannabis consumption (Dobri et al, 2019 ), with a maximum salivary Δ 9 -THC level of 16 μmol L −1 observed 1–2 h after consuming the drug (Niedbala et al, 2001 ). Acute cannabis intoxication is associated with impaired driving, significantly increasing the odds of motor vehicle collision (Dahlgren et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Types Of Drugs Of Abuse and Their Toxicological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%