Are (male) leaders “feminine” enough?

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to further understanding concerning sex differences in leadership styles and to examine the mediating role of gender identity traits in these differences.Design/methodology/approachThe paper draws on previous research that has established that many aspects of leadership style positively related to leaders' effectiveness are associated with the female gender role. Consistent with this assumption, the authors examined a sample of 157 Spanish managers whether significant sex differences favouring women emerge in relevant leadership dimensions (i.e. individualized consideration, contingent reward and emotional intelligence) and whether gender identity traits may help to explain such differences.FindingsResults show that male leaders' lower scores in individualized consideration, positive contingent reward and emotional intelligence are partly explained by their lower identification with expressive traits. Furthermore, results indicate that integration of counter‐stereotypical traits into the self positively relates to effectiveness in the sense of use of a wider range of leadership styles for both women and men.Research limitations/implicationsFuture research could explore in more detail how sex differences in leadership styles are associated with gendered traits of identity in different countries, as well as whether a blend of masculine and feminine traits is predictive for a more multifaceted leadership style.Originality/valueThe findings are discussed in terms of how a gender perspective may help to better understand leadership effectiveness in contemporary organizations, especially in the case of male leaders.

The influence of sex and gender-role orientation in the decision to become an entrepreneur

“…The stereotype threat of the entrepreneur is one of the likely reasons for the gender gap in entrepreneurship (Gupta et al, 2009). The threat may be subverted if one thinks that workplaces, jobs or professions are mixed, regardless of whether they have been traditionally held by men or women (Cacouault, 2000;Gartzia & van Engen, 2012;Nmecha & Bowen, 2015).…”

Are people-oriented leaders perceived as less effective in task performance? Surprising results from two experimental studies

“…We focused on the analysis of male leaders for our manipulation of leadership people-orientation as most leaders in organizations are men (World Economic Forum, 2009) and they often face the challenge of leading in a people-oriented way (Gartzia & van Engen, 2012). Half of the subjects rated a people-oriented leader and the other half rated a leader who explicitly lacked people-orientation (see description below).…”

Women and leadership: Gender barriers to senior management positions

“…Los rasgos estereotípicamente masculinos se vinculan con un estilo de liderazgo autoritario, directivo y centrado en la tarea y los rasgos estereotípicamente femeninos con un estilo de liderazgo democrático, participativo y centrado en las relaciones interpersonales (Eagly & Johnson, 1990;Fridell, Newcom Belcher & Messner, 2009;Gartzia & Van Engen, 2012;Oakley, 2000;Post, 2015;Powell, 2011;Van Engen & Willemsen, 2004). En la misma línea, el estilo de liderazgo transformacional basado en aspectos como la motivación, orientación, estimulación o capacitación de los seguidores se relaciona con la forma de liderar de las mujeres (Barberá Heredia & Ramos López, 2004;Dodd, 2012;Evans, 2010;Hoyt, 2010;Trinidad & Normore, 2005).…”