2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.08.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Live Instructors Replaceable? Computer vs. Classroom Lectures for EFAST Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
68
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of web-based teaching on ultrasound skills 24 25. No previous studies have evaluated emergency physicians in performing echocardiography after a training method that includes web-based learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of web-based teaching on ultrasound skills 24 25. No previous studies have evaluated emergency physicians in performing echocardiography after a training method that includes web-based learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While practical ultrasound skills may be quickly acquired in brief training courses [13, 14], the advancement of computer- and online-based training calls into question the necessity of a training seminar to convey pure theoretical knowledge of basic ultrasound concepts [15]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we focus on preclass videos, literature comparing videos to lectures is unclear, with some studies favoring videos, and some finding no difference in learning outcomes . In other studies, video groups showed worse learning outcomes, with authors citing reasons including no peer interaction, low compliance with learning plans, and lack of accountability . Studies reported suboptimal use of videos, with view rate from around 60% to 83% .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%