2008
DOI: 10.1525/auk.2008.06171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ARE LATE-SPRING BOREAL LESSER SCAUP (AYTHYA AFFINIS) IN POOR BODY CONDITION?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A relatively inflexible strategy such as this is corroborated by observed patterns in scaup. Breeding in scaup is initiated during a narrow window of time across a broad range of latitude and elevation (DeVink et al 2008, Gurney et al 2011), a possible product of strong heritability of nest initiation date (Findlay and Cooke 1982). If timing of breeding is the sum of heritable nest initiation date and nonheritable influences of body condition and environmental factors (sensu Price et al 1988), then the latter would appear to have the weakest influence on timing of breeding, and thus clutch size, in scaup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relatively inflexible strategy such as this is corroborated by observed patterns in scaup. Breeding in scaup is initiated during a narrow window of time across a broad range of latitude and elevation (DeVink et al 2008, Gurney et al 2011), a possible product of strong heritability of nest initiation date (Findlay and Cooke 1982). If timing of breeding is the sum of heritable nest initiation date and nonheritable influences of body condition and environmental factors (sensu Price et al 1988), then the latter would appear to have the weakest influence on timing of breeding, and thus clutch size, in scaup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decoy-trapped females were lighter than shot females after accounting for temporal effects and ingesta mass. The difference was more pronounced in 2004, when females generally were lighter than in 2003, possibly due to a late spring thaw (Environment Canada 2004*) which may have reduced food availability (Devink et al 2008). We suspect the mass difference between methods was due to a greater proportion of yearlings or poorer quality females in the decoy-trapped sample, but could not test this hypothesis.…”
Section: Body Condition and Age Bias Associated With Decoy Trapsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Similarly, on the breeding grounds, lipid reserves of females recently arrived in the southern Manitoba parkland in 2000 and 2001 were much lower than 1977-1980 values (Anteau and Afton 2004). For boreal breeding scaup, historical nutrient reserve data are sparse (body mass only; Trauger 1971) but lipid reserves of boreal females measured during [2003][2004] in northern Alberta and the Northwest Territories were much lower than historical values reported for females in northwestern Minnesota in 1986-1988and southwestern Manitoba in 1977-1980(Anteau and Afton 2004, 2009a; but see DeVink et al 2008c). Furthermore, recent studies have reported that some reproductive parameters, such as nest success, female survival, duckling and brood survival, and breeding probability, were low in boreal and parkland breeding sites, at rates that would be consistent with the SCH (Fournier and Hines 2001;Brook 2002;Koons and Rotella 2003;Corcoran et al 2007;Martin et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%