2015
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cku253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are hospital process quality indicators influenced by socio-demographic health determinants

Abstract: Monitoring the evidence-based hospital health care process indicators reveals undesirable disparities. Administrative data sets are of considerable practical value in broad-based quality assessments and as a screening tool, also in the health disparities domain.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multivariate analysis nonetheless showed that gender disparities in STEMI management persisted after the network’s implementation. This is consistent with the gender disparities seen in our previous studies [ 42 , 43 , 44 ]. This inequity in the administration of the evidence-based best treatment for STEMI might be partly attributable to a greater delay before women access hospital care, which would prevent the adoption of a PCI approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Multivariate analysis nonetheless showed that gender disparities in STEMI management persisted after the network’s implementation. This is consistent with the gender disparities seen in our previous studies [ 42 , 43 , 44 ]. This inequity in the administration of the evidence-based best treatment for STEMI might be partly attributable to a greater delay before women access hospital care, which would prevent the adoption of a PCI approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Aging rate was expected to be related to IHD mortality. However, illiteracy and accessibility indexes that are often discussed in scientific literature but not specifying its real importance and weight [3,7,8] were important for index formation and can be considered in public policies to reduce mortality. Examples are increasing the number of ambulances as well as the differential management of patients who are more than 120 minutes from the reference hemodynamics centers.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, models based on individual data do not represent cultural and socioeconomic disease determinants, which are essential for public health policy and population well-being. The relationship between municipality indicators with socioeconomic and demographic factors, health coverage, and high mortality IHD rates is well documented in the scientific literature [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 9 The impacts of these factors weigh heavily on individual health outcomes and often are cumulatively responsible, along with chronic conditions, for disparities in disabilities, increased hospitalisations and more frequent hospital readmissions. 10–13 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 9 The impacts of these factors weigh heavily on individual health outcomes and often are cumulatively responsible, along with chronic conditions, for disparities in disabilities, increased hospitalisations and more frequent hospital readmissions. [10][11][12][13] In comparison with other high-income and middleincome countries, the USA consistently scores poorly in overall health outcomes and access to healthcareassociated with socioeconomic factors. 14 In Washington state, the effects of health disparities have been linked with a 10-year difference in life expectancy between urban and rural counties and a 12-year gap in longevity for particular racial and ethnic groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%