2017
DOI: 10.1111/padm.12359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are future bureaucrats more prosocial?

Abstract: This article explores the associations between self‐reported Public Service Motivation (PSM) and preferred job traits, study choice, and observable prosocial behaviour. We studied three subject pools covering over 250 university students in Germany. We used laboratory experiments with monetary rewards to measure altruism, fairness, strategic fairness, and cooperativeness, and a post‐experimental survey on subjects' PSM. Higher levels of PSM were not associated with studying public administration but were posit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another open question is whether the relationship between personal motives and public sector employment is due to selection, including self‐selection (individuals with specific motives are sorted into the public sector), and/or due to socialization (personal motives tend to change during the employment in a specific sector). With respect to selection, Dur and Zoutenbier () find that public sector employees are higher in altruism, on average, even at zero years of work experience, Tepe and Vanhuysse () find a positive selection effect for experimentally observed altruism, and Holt () finds a positive selection effect for prosocial motivation in general. To estimate socialization effects, some studies analyze the effects of changes between the private and public sector on prosocial motivation or behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another open question is whether the relationship between personal motives and public sector employment is due to selection, including self‐selection (individuals with specific motives are sorted into the public sector), and/or due to socialization (personal motives tend to change during the employment in a specific sector). With respect to selection, Dur and Zoutenbier () find that public sector employees are higher in altruism, on average, even at zero years of work experience, Tepe and Vanhuysse () find a positive selection effect for experimentally observed altruism, and Holt () finds a positive selection effect for prosocial motivation in general. To estimate socialization effects, some studies analyze the effects of changes between the private and public sector on prosocial motivation or behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on prosocial motivation has largely focused on altruism (e.g. Andreoni, ; Khalil, ; Konow, ), which has been found to relate positively to public sector employment (Dur and Zoutenbier, , ; Tepe and Vanhuysse, )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, PSM has been associated with a variety of prosocial behaviors, such as volunteering and donating time or blood (Houston, 2006;Coursey et al, 2008;Clerkin et al, 2009;Lee, 2012;Piatak and Holt, 2020). The relationship between PSM and observed prosocial behavior is also found in laboratory and field experiments: People with higher PSM are more altruistic, egalitarian, cooperative, and trustworthy, and are more likely to undertake altruistic punishment to uphold social justice (Esteve et al, 2015(Esteve et al, , 2016Tepe, 2016;Tepe and Vanhuysse, 2017;Prokop and Tepe, 2020).…”
Section: Moralities and Psmmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Tepe and Vanhuysse () use a series of monetarily incentivized laboratory experiments (i.e., the dictator game, the ultimatum game, and the public goods game) to measure prosocial behaviours in samples of students of public administration, business and law. The aim is to observe how these three groups differ in terms of their prosocial behaviours (for example, the amount contributed in a public goods game) and, importantly, how these revealed behaviours are related to public service motivation.…”
Section: Contributions Of Behavioural Public Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%