2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are economic complexity and eco-innovation mutually exclusive to control energy demand and environmental quality in E7 and G7 countries?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results indicate lack of intensive spreading of eco-innovations to underscore its importance in reducing the ecological footprint. These results support the study by (Doğan et al,2022) but are not in conformity to the studies by (Erdoğan et al, 2022;Mahmood et al,2022).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results indicate lack of intensive spreading of eco-innovations to underscore its importance in reducing the ecological footprint. These results support the study by (Doğan et al,2022) but are not in conformity to the studies by (Erdoğan et al, 2022;Mahmood et al,2022).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…It also includes additional explanatory variables like forest cover (FOREST), renewable energy (RE) and per capita GDP (GDPPC). These variables, based on the existing literature can be described as underlying agents in the process of environmental quality (Afshan and Yaqoob, 2022; Doğan et al, 2022). The crucial contribution of the study in the extant empirical literature is the assessment of the moderating term between eco-innovations and agriculture with the moderation on the levels of ecological footprint.…”
Section: Model Speci Cationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as we expected, GDP has a positive impact on CO 2 emissions in developing countries, especially in E7 countries. When other macroeconomic conditions (influencing factors) are constant (e.g., FDI, TRO, FIN, INF, and GOE), the results according to FMOLS, DOLS, and CCR show that a 1% increase in GDP per capita will increase CO 2 emissions by 0.881%, 0.946%, and 0.875%, respectively, which indicates that the current economic growth has not reached the inflection point (inverted U-shaped relationship) for energy saving and emission reduction, i.e., the EKC assumption is valid for E7 countries (Doğan et al, 2022 ). Meanwhile, this also means that the rapid economic development of the E7 countries in the context of economic globalization has led to an increase in energy demand and thus to environmental degradation.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in the long term, the improvement of green innovation will reduce China’s CO 2 emissions, whereas the decline in green innovation will increase China’s carbon dioxide emissions. Similarly, Doğan et al ( 2022 ) examined the impact of green innovation on environmental quality in E7 and G7 countries using an augmented model, which found that green innovation reduced carbon emissions in G7 countries, but exacerbated environmental problems in E7 countries. This view is supported by the findings of Yuan et al ( 2021 ), Habiba et al ( 2022 ), Khattak et al ( 2020 ), and You et al ( 2022 ) for China, Top 12 Carbon Emitters, OECD countries, and the USA, respectively, which vary widely among countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings suggest that ecological innovation is the optimum determinant in making significant advancements in sustainable development, whether by limiting the ecologic impacts of production modes, improving nature's resilience to environmental stressors, or attaining a more productive and liable use of natural resources. These facts are in agreement with those published previously by Doğan et al (2022) (Doğan et al, 2022) and X. Ji.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarkssupporting
confidence: 94%