2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7nj00803a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are different crystallinity-index-calculating methods of hydroxyapatite efficient and consistent?

Abstract: Different CI-calculating methods of XRD, FTIR and Raman techniques showed high efficiency and consistency.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The crystallinity index (CI) is a measure of the perfection and degree of ordering in a sample. It correlates linearly with NHAp crystal size and perfection in the caxis direction, and has obvious influences on hardness and density of the material [2,32,33]. CI is calculated (Table 1) from both FTIR (height method) and XRD (height method) according to the method and formulae used by the researchers [32,[34][35][36].…”
Section: Crystallinity Index (Ci)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The crystallinity index (CI) is a measure of the perfection and degree of ordering in a sample. It correlates linearly with NHAp crystal size and perfection in the caxis direction, and has obvious influences on hardness and density of the material [2,32,33]. CI is calculated (Table 1) from both FTIR (height method) and XRD (height method) according to the method and formulae used by the researchers [32,[34][35][36].…”
Section: Crystallinity Index (Ci)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High substitution of CO 3 2 -in NHAp/PVP reduces its crystallinity considerably [37]. NHAp with reduced crystallinity has high solubility and protein absorption capacity [33].…”
Section: Crystallinity Index (Ci)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Os resultados de DRX não apresentaram nenhuma alteração estrutural e comprovaram a presença das duas fases (CHI e HA) nos compósitos. A partir dos resultados de DRX obtevese o índice de cristalinidade (IC) das amostras (Tabela II), onde foi observado que todas apresentaram um valor de IC baixo, indicando baixa cristalinidade da HA [18]. O IC dos compósitos com quitosana de média massa molecular (M-CHI50/HA50 e M-CHI20/HA80) foi um pouco maior do que aqueles preparados com quitosana de baixa massa molecular ((L-CHI50/HA50 e L-CHI20/HA80), o que sugeriu que os biomateriais desenvolvidos possuíram uma característica amorfa predominante; isso pode ser devido ao fato de não terem sido sinterizados, o que pode favorecer uma maior biodegradabilidade.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Para o cálculo do índice de cristalinidade (IC) das amostras, utilizaram-se os padrões de DRX, conforme a Eq. D [18], onde β 002 representa a largura à meia altura da reflexão do plano (002): IC = (0.24/b 002 ) 3 (D)…”
Section: Methodsunclassified