2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are current analytical methods suitable to verify VITAL® 2.0/3.0 allergen reference doses for EU allergens in foods?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ELISA was not evaluated for its sensitivity in detecting raw clam protein because clams are typically heat-processed in food formulations. The minimal eliciting or threshold dose for clam protein in clam-allergic individuals is not known but such threshold doses are known for several other allergenic foods and were related to analytical methods to quantify allergens in food [ 30 ]. Based on the mean dose for 10 food allergens needed to provoke an objective allergic reaction in the 1% most sensitive segment of the food-allergic population [ 30 ] and using a conservatively high consumption amount of 250 g of whole clam, the mean action level for analytical methods should be 7 ppm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ELISA was not evaluated for its sensitivity in detecting raw clam protein because clams are typically heat-processed in food formulations. The minimal eliciting or threshold dose for clam protein in clam-allergic individuals is not known but such threshold doses are known for several other allergenic foods and were related to analytical methods to quantify allergens in food [ 30 ]. Based on the mean dose for 10 food allergens needed to provoke an objective allergic reaction in the 1% most sensitive segment of the food-allergic population [ 30 ] and using a conservatively high consumption amount of 250 g of whole clam, the mean action level for analytical methods should be 7 ppm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to its well-known selectivity and sensitivity, MS have the power to overcome immunoassays (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA) and PCR-based techniques, the historically most adopted methods for allergens detection and quantitation. Specifically, although ELISA methods boost a general high sensitivity, they still encounter disadvantages such as cross-reactions with food matrix, limited reproducibility, variable specificity of antibodies in the commercial kits, lack of standard reference materials for some allergens and missing multiplexing detection ability [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 There are also few official analytical methods and limits of determination that are accepted as analytical reference in specific countries, such in the case of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods for allergen detection in Germany and Japan. 21 Overall, this poses a great risk for allergic people, as witnessed by the still observed reactions to food allergens, present even in countries with mandatory labeling. 22 …”
Section: International Requirements For Allergenic Ingredients Labellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods, such as ELISA and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), while covering some of the above-mentioned limitations also carry method-specific issues, as illustrated by Holzhauser et al. 21 Efforts have been directed at the European level to overcome issues encountered in food allergen analysis. The establishment of reference doses and the necessity for sensitive and harmonized analytical methods along with the production of allergen Reference Materials have been the key objectives of the past Integrated Approaches to Food Allergen and Allergy Management (IFAAM) project, are part of the objectives of the International Association for Monitoring and Quality Assurance in the Total Food Supply Chain (MoniQA), and are part of the current European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) funded Detection and Quantification of Allergens in Food and Minimum Eliciting Doses in Food Allergic Individuals (ThRAll) project.…”
Section: The Proteomic Mass Spectrometry Based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%