2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12904-018-0388-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are care staff equipped for end-of-life communication? A cross-sectional study in long-term care facilities to identify determinants of self-efficacy

Abstract: BackgroundEnd-of-life conversations are rarely initiated by care staff in long-term care facilities. A possible explanation is care staff’s lack of self-efficacy in such conversations. Research into the determinants of self-efficacy for nurses and care assistants in end-of-life communication is scarce and self-efficacy might differ between care staff of mental health facilities, nursing homes, and care homes. This study aimed to explore differences between care staff in mental health facilities, nursing homes,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
79
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An association was also found between the professionals’ level of self-efficacy in palliative care and their previous training in end-of-life care, both in contrast tests and in the linear regression model, with a higher level being observed in professionals who had received training. This is consistent with previous studies, which point to training as a key aspect [22,23,36,37,48]. One study in the United Kingdom evaluated the change in scale scores in medical students after a theoretical-practical training programme in palliative care and observed an increase in the subscales of communication, patient management, and teamworking [36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An association was also found between the professionals’ level of self-efficacy in palliative care and their previous training in end-of-life care, both in contrast tests and in the linear regression model, with a higher level being observed in professionals who had received training. This is consistent with previous studies, which point to training as a key aspect [22,23,36,37,48]. One study in the United Kingdom evaluated the change in scale scores in medical students after a theoretical-practical training programme in palliative care and observed an increase in the subscales of communication, patient management, and teamworking [36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The SEPC has been used in a multicentre study in long-term care facilities in 6 European countries (Belgium, England, Finland, Italy, The Netherlands, and Poland) [22], but, although a forward–backward translation was conducted in each country, the authors did not report data about formal validation except in the original English version. This scale has also been used in a study to identify determinants of high self-efficacy in nurses and care assistants of long-term-care centres in Germany, but the researchers did not specify if they used a translated or a validated German version [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly, nurses trained in palliative care bear higher self-efficacy [29]. Knowledge is considered a stable and fundamental element for nursing performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These programs often focus on acute patient care and fail to regard patients in the end stage of life. As a result, nurses who are unaware of palliative care may not be prepared to cope with patients who are passing out [29,31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barriers, from level of competency through to system level legislation, can have an impact on effective engagement of end-of-life discussions and in turn they can negatively affect the quality of end-of-life care for patients. However, potential solutions are also suggested both at the internal service level (palliative care and communication training [11] and mentoring) and at system-wide level (regulation, legislation, and accreditation) [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%