2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are birth weight predictors in diabetic pregnancy the same in boys and girls?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
11
1
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
11
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to a study of children investigating the outcome of blood pressure that, despite having explored and found gender differences in the birth weight to risk relationship, did not detect an effect at the higher birth weight range in females (22). These gender differences are not unexpected, given that there is a suggestion that intrauterine effects of maternal obesity and diabetes affect male and female fetuses differently (24,25). Gestational diabetes predicted macrosomia exclusively in male fetuses (24), but in another study equally in both sexes (26).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in contrast to a study of children investigating the outcome of blood pressure that, despite having explored and found gender differences in the birth weight to risk relationship, did not detect an effect at the higher birth weight range in females (22). These gender differences are not unexpected, given that there is a suggestion that intrauterine effects of maternal obesity and diabetes affect male and female fetuses differently (24,25). Gestational diabetes predicted macrosomia exclusively in male fetuses (24), but in another study equally in both sexes (26).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Gestational diabetes predicted macrosomia exclusively in male fetuses (24), but in another study equally in both sexes (26). A study of diabetic pregnancies showed that females were more likely than males to be large for gestational age or macrosomic in association with greater maternal weight gain (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All variables with p<0.5 in the univariate analysis were entered into the model, and then non-significant variables were removed iteratively (according to decreasing p value) until only those with p<0.1 remained, details of which are shown is some evidence that variation in birthweight may be at least partly determined by fetal growth within the first 12 weeks after conception [38], investigation of the association of periconception hyperglycaemia with early fetal growth is crucial for understanding the mechanisms of growth restriction or overgrowth in pregnancies of women with diabetes. In addition to maternal hyperglycaemia, other factors, such as non-smoking, higher maternal height and BMI, found to be associated with higher birthweight in offspring of women with diabetes by previous studies [27,30], were also independent significant predictors of increased birthweight in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Second-trimester HbA 1c , although being strongly correlated with third-trimester HbA 1c , was a much weaker predictor of increase in birthweight and lost its effect after adjustment for third-trimester HbA 1c . Although earlier studies have not LGA was defined as birthweight ≥90th centile, and SGA as birthweight <10th centile, according to Scottish birthweight standards (by fetal sex, parity and gestational age) [24] HbA 1c was reported to be a significant predictor of LGA birthweight in a cohort of women with type 1, type 2 and gestational diabetes after adjustment for a number of confounders [30]. In a study of pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance, maternal fasting glycaemia during 32-35 weeks was the strongest predictor of accelerated growth in the late third trimester, whereas in the late second and early third trimester and at birth the dominant predictors were previous LGA or maternal obesity [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verkauskiene et al (27) , reported the dominance of being SGA in females. Sojo et al (28) , found that being a SGA was equal in both genders. Some studies investigating the effect of gender on birth weight have also demonstrated that mother ' s nutritional status might have an effect on determining the gender of the fetus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%