2011
DOI: 10.3189/172756411795931714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arctic sea-ice melt in 2008 and the role of solar heating

Abstract: There has been a marked decline in the summer extent of Arctic sea ice over the past few decades. Data from autonomous ice mass-balance buoys can enhance our understanding of this decline. These buoys monitor changes in snow deposition and ablation, ice growth, and ice surface and bottom melt. Results from the summer of 2008 showed considerable large-scale spatial variability in the amount of surface and bottom melt. Small amounts of melting were observed north of Greenland, while melting in the southern Beauf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(37 reference statements)
2
79
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4) of areas with an increased relative melt pond fraction in the beginning of June indicates the ice free areas later in September. This agrees with the statements of Perovich et al (2002bPerovich et al ( , 2011b, that early occurrence of melt ponds has a strong influence on the formation of open water areas. Clearly visible is also the appearance of homogeneous areas with a very high relative melt pond fraction up to 70 % at the end of June on the flat first year ice in the Canadian Archipelago.…”
Section: A Rösel Et Al: Melt Ponds On Arctic Sea Icesupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4) of areas with an increased relative melt pond fraction in the beginning of June indicates the ice free areas later in September. This agrees with the statements of Perovich et al (2002bPerovich et al ( , 2011b, that early occurrence of melt ponds has a strong influence on the formation of open water areas. Clearly visible is also the appearance of homogeneous areas with a very high relative melt pond fraction up to 70 % at the end of June on the flat first year ice in the Canadian Archipelago.…”
Section: A Rösel Et Al: Melt Ponds On Arctic Sea Icesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In order to better constrain the role of sea ice for the Arctic amplification and Earth's climate system, it is important to quantify the large-scale distribution of melt ponds (e.g. Holland et al, 2006;Eisenman and Wettlaufer, 2009;Notz, 2009;Tietsche et al, 2011;Serreze, 2011;Serreze et al, 2011;Kurtz et al, 2011;Perovich et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pigments were extracted in 90 % acetone for 18 to 24 h in the dark at 4 • C (Parsons et al, 1984). Fluorescence of the extracted pigments was measured on board with a Turner Designs fluorometer (model 10-005R; Turner Designs, Inc.) before and after acidification with 5 % HCl.…”
Section: Phytoplankton Biomass and Enumeration Bacterial Countmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Snow deposited at the surface of the sea ice progressively melts during the thawing season and may accumulate above sea level in depressions at the surface of the ice to form melt ponds (Lüthje et al, 2006), likely through a recently identified process of percolation blockage (Polashenski et al, 2017). In the Arctic, melt pond fraction over first-year sea ice (FYI) in late springsummer usually ranges from 50 to 60 %, locally reaching 90 % (Fetterer and Untersteiner, 1998;Eicken et al, 2004;Lüthje et al, 2006;Perovich et al, 2011). Rösel et al (2012) reported a 15 % increase of the relative melt pond fraction for the month of June during the last decade (2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011) in the Arctic, most likely attributable to global climate change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, q freezing is the freezing temperature (-0.054×S may serve as a good proxy for the 632 freezing point temperature), r w is water density, c p is specific heat of seawater and z 1 For the upper boundary of the layer, for which Q is estimated, we selected the depth 645 65 m, chosen because this best determines the layer in which heat from the AW is stored 646 and released (14). The depth of winter ventilation H vent is defined using an assumption 647 that, starting from this depth, changes of water properties are not directly linked to the 648 surface processes so that, for example, increase of depth of integration for calculation of 649 Q beyond H vent would not lead to statistically significant change of Q.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%