2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ArCo: An artificial counterfactual approach for high-dimensional panel time-series data

Abstract: We consider a new, flexible and easy-to-implement method to estimate causal effects of an intervention on a single treated unit and when a control group is not readily available. We propose a two-step methodology where in the first stage a counterfactual is estimated from a large-dimensional set of variables from a pool of untreated units using shrinkage methods, such as the Least Absolute Shrinkage Operator (LASSO). In the second stage, we estimate the average intervention effect on a vector of variables, whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The SCM, HCW, DI and CIM assume a linear relationship between the outcome of the treated unit and the outcomes of control units but this is a strong assumption. Carvalho, Masini and Medeiros (2018) account for non-linear relationships by regressing y n1+1,t on transformations of the outcomes of control units but it is hard to choose which transformations to use. Therefore, it would be worth estimating the relationship between y n1+1,t and the outcomes of the control units non-parametrically using, for example, machine learning techniques.…”
Section: Proposals For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SCM, HCW, DI and CIM assume a linear relationship between the outcome of the treated unit and the outcomes of control units but this is a strong assumption. Carvalho, Masini and Medeiros (2018) account for non-linear relationships by regressing y n1+1,t on transformations of the outcomes of control units but it is hard to choose which transformations to use. Therefore, it would be worth estimating the relationship between y n1+1,t and the outcomes of the control units non-parametrically using, for example, machine learning techniques.…”
Section: Proposals For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A popular model assumption is that the potential outcome is linear in observed covariates and unobserved common factors (Abadie et al, 2010(Abadie et al, , 2015. Abadie et al (2010Abadie et al ( , 2015, Hsiao et al (2012), Doudchenko and Imbens (2016), Li and Bell (2017), Li (2017), Carvalho et al (2018), andMasini andMedeiros (2018) propose to match each treated unit by weighted averages of all control units using the pretreatment observations. Li and Bell (2017) and Li (2017) further show the inferential theory for the average treatment effect over time.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…using the LASSO method to select control units and Carvalho et al (2018) show the inferential theory for the LASSO method. Masini and Medeiros (2018) focus on the high-dimensional, nonstationary data.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal is to estimate how the outcome variables would have behaved had Turkey not implemented the new set of instruments. In addition, we construct another artificial counterfactual using the method proposed by Carvalho et al (2016). Previous works explored the impact of macro-prudential policies on central bank efficiency.…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the synthetic control method, we construct a comparison unit by attributing different weights to available control countries, based on the preintervention period. The artificial counterfactual suggested by Carvalho et al (2016) is arguably similar and it works in a two-step approach: the first is estimating a model using the data previous to the event of interest, and the second is estimating the average intervention effect on the treated unit. Their model allows for multiple variables analysis, as well as a defined inference procedure.…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%