2019
DOI: 10.1214/19-sts713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Causal Effect of Binary Interventions from Observational Panel Data with Few Treated Units

Abstract: Researchers are often challenged with assessing the impact of an intervention on an outcome of interest in situations where the intervention is non-randomised, the intervention is only applied to one or few units, the intervention is binary, and outcome measurements are available at multiple time points. In this paper, we review existing methods for causal inference in these situations. We detail the assumptions underlying each method, emphasize connections between the different approaches and provide guidelin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reference zones of increasing distance from the MPAs considered important for estimating MPA impacts [ 135 ] were (1) the southern zone, (2) the northwest zone, and (3) the northeast zone. We then fit a Bayesian state-space or structural times series model [ 137 , 140 ] with weakly informative regularizing priors to the zone-specific data using the R package [ 137 ]. We focus only on the 2009 intervention since the 2014 MPA expansions are too recent to be evaluated using this approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reference zones of increasing distance from the MPAs considered important for estimating MPA impacts [ 135 ] were (1) the southern zone, (2) the northwest zone, and (3) the northeast zone. We then fit a Bayesian state-space or structural times series model [ 137 , 140 ] with weakly informative regularizing priors to the zone-specific data using the R package [ 137 ]. We focus only on the 2009 intervention since the 2014 MPA expansions are too recent to be evaluated using this approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating social, conservation or management policy interventions using observational data is challenging and can lead to ambiguous conclusions [139]-especially if the intervention is nonrandomized, there are few treatment units affected by the intervention and there are multiple time-dependent outcome measures [140]. In our case, the MPA expansions (interventions) were prescribed (not random) and also binary (all or nothing), there were few MPAs to assess, and the data series were time-dependent.…”
Section: Statistical Modeling Approaches For Counterfactual Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We do not consider the interaction of interventions, but merely their joint effect as mandated through the Tier system. In generating counterfactuals our model makes a “difference in differences” counterfactual assumption, which has previously been shown to have limitations [11] arising from the assumption of parallel trajectories. It is important to note that the effect sizes we model quantify the instantaneous and constant impact of the Tiers on R t , whereas the effects of Tiers may vary over time, perhaps with a lag before they take effect or with a waning of efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, the measurements would be taken frequently enough (say, daily or weekly) to enable the application of time-series methods (e.g. Granger causality or cointegration tests), which would help determine the causal structures of the time variation of exogenous factors on the SRB ( Samartsidis et al, 2018 ). On the other hand, only a small subset of US environmental quality measurements were available in Sweden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%