2016
DOI: 10.1177/1357034x16662324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Architecture of Sensation

Abstract: Recent social theory that stresses the ‘nonrepresentational’, the ‘more-than visual’, and the relationship between affect and sensation have tended to assume some kind of break or rupture from historical antecedents. Especially since the contributions of Crary and Jay in the 1990s, when it comes to perceiving the built environment the complexities of sensation have been partially obscured by the dominance of a static model of vision as the principal organizing modality. This article returns to some prior histo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Affordances also relate to multiple sensory pathways, and their relative importance varies between individuals, especially those with disabilities that impair or enhance certain sensory pathways (Macpherson, 2009). Research which has focused on disabled greenspace users has noted specific needs relating to visual, auditory, or tactile stimuli, which are often understudied in comparison with visual approaches (Chawla & Heft, 2002; Mount & Cavet, 1995; Pallasmaa, 2012; Paterson, 2017). Hussein (2012), for example, applied affordances to rethink nature experiences for disabled children in a sensory garden, showing the importance of the connectivity of different behaviour settings and demonstrating a greater inclination for sensory affordances over traditional visual aesthetic elements.…”
Section: Affordances In Greenspace Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affordances also relate to multiple sensory pathways, and their relative importance varies between individuals, especially those with disabilities that impair or enhance certain sensory pathways (Macpherson, 2009). Research which has focused on disabled greenspace users has noted specific needs relating to visual, auditory, or tactile stimuli, which are often understudied in comparison with visual approaches (Chawla & Heft, 2002; Mount & Cavet, 1995; Pallasmaa, 2012; Paterson, 2017). Hussein (2012), for example, applied affordances to rethink nature experiences for disabled children in a sensory garden, showing the importance of the connectivity of different behaviour settings and demonstrating a greater inclination for sensory affordances over traditional visual aesthetic elements.…”
Section: Affordances In Greenspace Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, suspension/ deposition highlighted the different scales at which indoor air quality is affected: from the macro-infrastructural factors that influence the physical arrangements of dwellings (inside/outside 2) to the more micro-material processes like cleaning that comprise lived domestic environments (inside/outside 3) (Wakefield-Rann and Fam, 2018). These alternative narratives of toxic agency (Waterton and Yusoff, 2017) were enabled through the decentring of the bounded human body as a site of exposure. Rather than different airs and similar bodies, which underpinned the project's concept of exposure when starting out, the iterative tinkerings to the model simulations rendered visible the way bodies participate in their co-composition, expanding the non-linear and intra-acting agencies that had be accounted for in order to understand and measure health risk.…”
Section: Insides/outsides 2: Unfolding Relations Between Bodies and Bmentioning
confidence: 99%