1991
DOI: 10.1109/5.119549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Architecture of fault-tolerant computers: an historical perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Redundancy is one of the most fundamental approaches to achieving reliability (Siemwiorek 1991), and also to achieving resilience (Alsberg and Day 1976). In most cases, redundancy refers to deploying into a system more components than are required for the functionality.…”
Section: Redundancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Redundancy is one of the most fundamental approaches to achieving reliability (Siemwiorek 1991), and also to achieving resilience (Alsberg and Day 1976). In most cases, redundancy refers to deploying into a system more components than are required for the functionality.…”
Section: Redundancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, a circuit module is triplicated and the corresponding output vectors are merged through a majority voter [11] [12]. Several investigations aimed at enhancing this basic idea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NASA has supported this type of fault tolerance throughout its history. The Saturn V launch vehicle used triple modular redundancy to control flight path adjustments, and the Space Shuttle uses software voting on the outputs of four modules (computers) for general control (Siewiorek 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%