2011
DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2011.5784001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Architecture of a network-aware P2P-TV application: the NAPA-WINE approach

Abstract: International audiencePeer to Peer streaming (P2P-TV) applications have recently emerged as cheap and efficient solutions to provide real time streaming services over the Internet. For the sake of simplicity, typical P2P-TV systems are designed and optimized following a pure layered approach, thus ignoring the effect of design choices on the underlying transport network. This simple approach, however, may constitute a threat for the network providers, due to the congestion that P2P-TV traffic can potentially g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretic findings are validated implementing the strategies devised in Sec. V into the PeerStreamer platform [9], and comparing them with the standard overlay management strategy available in PeerStreamer and used as reference for several works like [10], [11].…”
Section: Motivation and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretic findings are validated implementing the strategies devised in Sec. V into the PeerStreamer platform [9], and comparing them with the standard overlay management strategy available in PeerStreamer and used as reference for several works like [10], [11].…”
Section: Motivation and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the beginning of the streaming process, these chunks are all from the same peer (since only one peer is the source), then the source sends m copies of the chunks to random peers (m = 3 by default), creating an overlay topology with all peers [3] in order to exchange chunks between them. The whole architecture and vision of PeerStreamer is described in detail in [4].…”
Section: I I L I V E S T R E a M I N G S E R V I C Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was done in order to understand the different behaviors of the PeerStreamer algorithms such that the overlay network that it constructs can be optimized. The different parameters chosen include sending different amount of copies of the chunks from the PeerStreamer source (m = 5, m = 1); keeping the best peers in the neighborhood in between topology updates of the overlay that PeerStreamer creates (T opoKeepBest); and the addition of the peers that can be selected to the neighborhood by extending the default RT T (10 ms) of the peer selection metric [4] to 20 ms .…”
Section: Groups Of Nodes Upc Guifinet Awmn Ninuxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CONFINE project 5 was initiated to advance the understanding of the community network model, to explore the ways of improving the users quality of experience in a shared platform and to measure the sustainability of the network. For this purpose, the CONFINE project has developed an infrastructure called Community-Lab [1], which provides an environment to perform community network related experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this experimental system we deploy two applications, Tahoe-LAFS [2], [3] and PeerStreamer [4], [5], as community cloud services and measure the performance of these applications in the environment given by our approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%