Archetype-Based Electronic Health Records: A Literature Review and Evaluation of Their Applicability to Health Data Interoperability and Access

Abstract

Health Information Managers (HIMs) are responsible for overseeing health information. The change management necessary during the transition to electronic health records (EHR) is substantial, and ongoing. Archetype-based EHRs are a core health information system component which solve many of the problems that arise during this period of change. Archetypes are models of clinical content, and they have many beneficial properties. They are interoperable, both between settings and through time. They are more amenable to change than conventional paradigms, and their design is congruent with clinical practice. This paper is an overview of the current archetype literature relevant to Health Information Managers. The literature was sourced in the English language sections of ScienceDirect, IEEE Explore, Pubmed, Google Scholar, ACM Digital library and other databases on the usage of archetypes for electronic health record storage, looking at the current areas of archetype research, appropriate usage, and future research. We also used reference lists from the cited papers, papers referenced by the openEHR website, and the recommendations from experts in the area. Criteria for inclusion were (a) if studies covered archetype research and (b) were either studies of archetype use, archetype system design, or archetype effectiveness. The 47 papers included show a wide and increasing worldwide archetype usage, in a variety of medical domains. Most of the papers noted that archetypes are an appropriate solution for future-proof and interoperable medical data storage. We conclude that archetypes are a suitable solution for the complex problem of electronic health record storage and interoperability.

Messaging stndard requirements for electronic health records in Islamic Republic of Iran: a Delphi study

“…Wollersheim et al have suggested that, to present the clinical documentatio n components, each messaging standard uses a number of models and the types of model in the 2 standards are different and based on different objectives (27). Among the existing models, experts emphasize the reference and interaction models.…”

“…Among the existing models, experts emphasize the reference and interaction models. Wollersheim et al have reported that the reference model provides a base for data definition and incl u des several classes that support medicolegal requirements and record management functions (27). The model makes it possible to access further requirements of EHRs, which leads to the exchange of information between discrete systems.…”

Towards a Digital Earth: using archetypes to enable knowledge interoperability within geo-observational sensor systems design

“…Development of a mature, consensus-based repository of community derived archetypes is a non-trivial task, and requires established processes within any domain to ensure proper governance (Wollersheim et al 2009) (Garde et al 2007). However, with over 15 years of development experience, the technique is well supported by a strong theoretical and methodological framework.…”

Clustering clinical models from local electronic health records based on semantic similarity

“…They are aimed at developing, refining, implementing, and evaluating information models to ensure clinical involvement as well as semantically-interoperable systems [1,2,[6][7][8][9][10]. Recently, an analysis criticized that many existing clinical modeling approaches violate good modeling practice since they fail to model the requirements of the health care domain using a consistent healthcarespecific ontology [11].…”