2009
DOI: 10.1017/s0021859608008344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arbuscular mycorrhizal association in coffee

Abstract: SU MMARYDespite previous research on mycorrhizal association with plants, the data on associations with coffee (Coffea species) are very sparse despite the great economic importance of this crop for many tropical developing countries. The present paper reviews the main aspects of the association between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and coffee plants. This review includes topics on mycorrhizal effects on coffee nutritional status, pathogen-AMF interactions and responses to several environmental stresses. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
1
23

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(102 reference statements)
0
50
1
23
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess this hypothesis we estimated numbers and diversity of spores in the rhizosphere of the three cultivars. Although we were not able to identify species, the morphotypes we found appear to belong to species of Glomus and Sclerocystis [25,27], genera that have previously been reported from coffee [16,45,46]. All the spore morphotypes (except Sclerocystis) were present in all three cultivars, but they were differentially abundant among the cultivars.…”
Section: Differences Among Coffee Cultivars In Mycorrhizal Fungimentioning
confidence: 49%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To assess this hypothesis we estimated numbers and diversity of spores in the rhizosphere of the three cultivars. Although we were not able to identify species, the morphotypes we found appear to belong to species of Glomus and Sclerocystis [25,27], genera that have previously been reported from coffee [16,45,46]. All the spore morphotypes (except Sclerocystis) were present in all three cultivars, but they were differentially abundant among the cultivars.…”
Section: Differences Among Coffee Cultivars In Mycorrhizal Fungimentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Differences in relative abundance were not obvious and may not be biologically significant. A preliminary phylogeny based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences suggested that the Glomus present was related to G. sinuosum and G. manihotis, as expected [16] (data not shown). Thus there was no evidence that differences between cultivars in mycorrhizal hyphal length reflected differences in specificity for AM fungi.…”
Section: Differences Among Coffee Cultivars In Mycorrhizal Fungimentioning
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another related factor would be the dilution effect on the element on the tissues (Giri and Mukerji, 2004;Andrade et al, 2009). Probably, due to these reasons, coffee plants inoculated with D. heterogama showed a lower magnesium accumulation in comparison to those that were not inoculated or treated with C. etunicatum and R. clarus, when under the interference of U. brizantha.…”
Section: The Photoassimilates Distribution On U Brizantha Plants Depmentioning
confidence: 99%