2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3515056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arbitrariness, Subordination and Unequal Citizenship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assertion is significantly strengthened because the protection of Article 14 is not only reserved for Indian citizens but is also extended to non-citizens. 66 According to the interviews with one of the legal luminaries, the defenses of intelligible differentia and reasonable nexus cannot be applied in the present case as the object the Act seeks to achieve discriminatorily.…”
Section: Citizenship Amendment Act 2019 and The National Register Of ...mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This assertion is significantly strengthened because the protection of Article 14 is not only reserved for Indian citizens but is also extended to non-citizens. 66 According to the interviews with one of the legal luminaries, the defenses of intelligible differentia and reasonable nexus cannot be applied in the present case as the object the Act seeks to achieve discriminatorily.…”
Section: Citizenship Amendment Act 2019 and The National Register Of ...mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…On the contrary, the Supreme Court gave a green signal for updating the NRC. The Court played an active role in the whole process, which led to serious doubts about the Court’s neutrality and independence (Ahmed 2020: 136). The Court stated that the massive influx of ‘illegal migration’ in Assam is a violation of the ‘fundamental right to life and personal liberty’ and that it would be ‘guilty of shirking [their] Constitutional duty’ to ‘protect the lives of our own citizens and their culture’ if the petition was dismissed on the grounds of delay/laches.…”
Section: The Law and Discrimination In The Current Bjp Eramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, analysing the equality provisions of the Indian Constitution, Ahmed (2020) argues that the CAA ‘is not just unconstitutional, but patently, manifestly and obviously unconstitutional.’ Articulating the test for arbitrariness and anti-subordination, she elucidates that among other reasons for its unconstitutionality, the CAA implicates Article 14 (manifest arbitrariness) and Article 15 (equality protections on protected grounds) of the Indian Constitution. 11…”
Section: The Law and Discrimination In The Current Bjp Eramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12.In her legal and normative critique of the CAA, Farrah Ahmed describes it as ‘giving effect to a narrative in which Indian Muslims may have all or many of the legal benefits of citizenship, but are only citizens in an attenuated and marginal sense; the paradigm or central case of a citizen is not Muslim. Against this familiar narrative, the Act is recognizable as a subordinating speech act’ (Ahmed, 2020, p. 16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%