Aragonite saturation and pH variation in a fringing reef are strongly influenced by oceanic conditions

Abstract

Seasonal variations of the CO2 system in seawater for coral reefs are often controlled by both chemical‐biological processes and by regional oceanographic features in combination with the residence time of adjacent water. This study reports the seasonal variability of the CO2 system along a year though dissolved inorganic carbon and pH measurements in Cabo Pulmo, a fringing reef from the Mexican Pacific. Two conditions were found on the reef: summer with the presence of Tropical Surface Water (TSW), characterized by high temperature, lower DIC levels, and a higher aragonite saturation (Ωarag); and winter with Gulf of California Water (GCW), when the opposite occurred. This seasonal variation was due to the horizontal advection of two surface water masses: Gulf of California water during winter and Tropical Surface Water the rest of the year as a result of the ocean circulation at the entrance of the Gulf of California. Therefore, the reef is significantly influenced by open ocean waters, where the depth is less than 20 m. The seasonal variability in Ωarag between months with the presence of GCW and TSW is one of the largest ranges reported in coral reefs (ΔΩarag = 0.5 units). Our results suggest that the reef community cannot modify the aragonite or pH of incoming ocean water. This might be the case in other fringing reefs, where the use of ocean acidification forecast models is suitable.

Description of physical functionality in the coral reefs of Isla Espíritu Santo, La Paz, Baja California Sur

“…La tasa de calcificación (kg CaCO 3 m -2 año -1 ) de cada especie de coral se obtuvo de la información publicada de la tasa de extensión (cm año -1 ) y la densidad del esqueleto del coral (g cm -3 ) (P. verrucosa, P. capitata, P. meandrina y P. damicornis (Medellín-Maldonado et al, 2016;Tortolero-Langarica et al, 2017b), P. gigantea (Tortolero-Langarica et al, 2017b), P. panamensis (Cabral-Tena et al, 2013) y P. stellata (Bezy et al, 2006;Norzagaray-López et al, 2017). El cálculo se realizó siguiendo la metodología de González-Barrios & Álvarez-Filip (2018), para el caso de los corales ramificados se estimó de acuerdo con el tipo de crecimiento cilíndrico y para los corales masivos e incrustantes se estimó de acuerdo con el grupo paraboloide.…”