2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/4144254
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arab and Malay Students’ Attitudes toward Statistics and Their Learning Styles: A Rasch Measurement Approach

Abstract: Students’ learning of statistics has been studied from a variety of angles, and this study is no different. The main purpose is to compare the Malay and Arab students’ attitudes toward learning statistics and their learning styles in understanding statistics. A survey questionnaire and face-to-face interview techniques were used to elicit information from 150 students based on the cohort. They were asked about how they learn to solve statistical problems based on Kolb’s four learning cycles: feeling, reflectiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the successes in statistics education is influenced by attitudes toward statistics [ATS] (Cladera et al, 2019;Fayomi et al, 2022;Hommik & Luik, 2017;Peiró-Signes et al, 2020;Soe et al, 2021). Through the ATS assessment, educators can plan appropriate statistics learning strategies (Saidi & Siew, 2019;Soe et al, 2021;Vanhoof et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the successes in statistics education is influenced by attitudes toward statistics [ATS] (Cladera et al, 2019;Fayomi et al, 2022;Hommik & Luik, 2017;Peiró-Signes et al, 2020;Soe et al, 2021). Through the ATS assessment, educators can plan appropriate statistics learning strategies (Saidi & Siew, 2019;Soe et al, 2021;Vanhoof et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%