2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scp.2020.100335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aqueous nitrate ion adsorption/desorption by olive solid waste-based carbon activated using ZnCl2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Ion exchange needs high energy or a high or expensive dose of the reagent (Zeng et al 2020). In recent decades, the adsorption methods have received great attention in removal of nitrate or nitrite from water, due to its simplicity, sludge free operation, easiness in handing and availability of various adsorbents (Song et al 2016;Nassar et al 2020). So far, the clay materials such as hydrotalcites with advantages of low cost, abundant source and easy preparation, have gained great concern from researchers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ion exchange needs high energy or a high or expensive dose of the reagent (Zeng et al 2020). In recent decades, the adsorption methods have received great attention in removal of nitrate or nitrite from water, due to its simplicity, sludge free operation, easiness in handing and availability of various adsorbents (Song et al 2016;Nassar et al 2020). So far, the clay materials such as hydrotalcites with advantages of low cost, abundant source and easy preparation, have gained great concern from researchers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern was more likely caused by: (i) favorable conditions of nitrate removal accentuated by electrostatic attraction as adsorbent surface bears positive charge at lower pH. (ii) the presence of rivalry between nitrate ions and hydroxyl ions in basic solution, as also stated in other works using carbon-based activated carbon content [47,48,51]. In addition to the above-mentioned justifications, it may be further hypothesized that the underperformance of oxidized SBAC is due to the introduction of an acidic surface functional group; in the case of deprotonation, if pH> pHpzc, more binding sites for cationic sorbate are created on the surface than if it was an unoxidized adsorbent [44,52].…”
mentioning
confidence: 51%
“…As depicted in Figure 15, the synthesised sorbents with the highest adsorption potential were DC-5-750 M1 (127,6 mg/g) and DC-7-900 M1 (124,4 mg/g), and they were therefore chosen for future experiments, along with the unmodified sorbents (DC-5-surface reaction which are deemed to present less component resistance than external diffusion [46], while stagnant trend after 120 min may be ascribed to occupation of available adsorption site by nitrate ions as the process progress [25,47,48], which weaken the interaction between sorbate and adsorbent surface [48].…”
Section: Fig 14 Preliminary Adsorption Capacity For Nitratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Langkah aktivasi secara kimia yakni bahan baku berupa arang terlebih dahulu diperkecil ukurannya, kemudian arang direndam dalam bahan kimia. Larutan untuk aktivasi biasanya berupa asam contohnya adalah asam klorida (HCl) [13], asam sulfat (H2SO4) [14], atau basa seperti natrium hidroksida (NaOH) [15], dan dari garam seperti natrium khlorida (NaCl) [16], seng khlorida (ZnCl2) [17]. Arang direndam dalam larutan aktivator selama kurang lebih 24 jam [18,19].…”
unclassified