“…Researchers are mostly focusing their study on various types of inexpensive and effective materials such as different clays, coconut shell carbon, chemically activated carbon, bone charcoal, natural zeolites, burnt clay, activated alumina (Ayoob et al 2008), red mud (Tor et al 2009) alum sludge (Sujana et al 1998), chitosan beads (Viswanathan and Meenakshi 2008), carbonaceous materials (Márquez-Mendoza et al 2012;Ikuo et al 2004), calcite (Yang et al 1999), montmorillonite (Tor 2006), Citrus limonum (lemon) leaf (Tomar et al 2014), Zr-Mn composite material (Tomar et al 2013), kanuma mud (Chen et al 2011), acid-treated bentonite (Ma et al 2011), polypyrrole/Fe 3 O 4 magnetic nanocomposite (Bhaumik et al 2011), bayerite/boehmite nanocomposites (Jia et al 2015), Fe-Mg-La triple-metal composite , hydrous ferric oxide (Nur et al 2014), hydroxyapatite (Jiménez-Reyes and Solache-Ríos 2013), ZnCr-layered double hydroxides and their polymeric composites (Koilraj and Kannan 2013), Ce(IV)-Zr(IV) mixed oxide nanoparticles (Ghosh et al 2015), spent bleaching earth (Mahramanlioglu et al 2002), and other low-cost adsorbents with various degrees of success (Ali 2006;Yadav et al 2006). So, there is a crucial need to explore locally available inexpensive defluoridation materials for safe and easy use at both household and small community levels.…”