2017
DOI: 10.1109/jstqe.2016.2609100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aptamer- and Fab’- Functionalized Microring Resonators for Aflatoxin M1 Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the sensitivity of AFM1 detection by both aptamers does not differ significantly and is close to the values obtained based on the label-free aptasensor presented above using APT1 and the EIS method of detection. We should also mention that the sensitivity of Fc-based detection by APT3 is much higher in comparison with optical detection as reported in [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the sensitivity of AFM1 detection by both aptamers does not differ significantly and is close to the values obtained based on the label-free aptasensor presented above using APT1 and the EIS method of detection. We should also mention that the sensitivity of Fc-based detection by APT3 is much higher in comparison with optical detection as reported in [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It can be seen that the sensitivity of aptasensors is comparable with that of immunosensors. The only exception is work by Chalyan et al [20] in which an immunosensor based on an AFM1-selective Fab’ fragment revealed higher sensitivity in comparison with those based on aptamers analyzed by the micro-ring resonator method. However, the LOD of this immunosensor (1641 ng/L) is not sufficient for practical applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The binding of AFM1 on the functionalized microring surface led to the effective refractive index change, and a resonance shift in the MRR transmission was then detected using off-chip silicon photodetectors. In addition, this approach was demonstrated for AFM1 determination specifically with a detection limit of 5 nM (Chalyan et al, 2017). Recently, a new aptamer specific to AFM1 was selected by a traditional SELEX technique with the dissociation constant of 35 nM (Malhotra et al, 2014).…”
Section: Aptasensor For the Analysis Of Aflatoxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%