Apricot Vegetative Growth, Tree Mortality, Productivity, Fruit Quality and Leaf Nutrient Composition as Affected by Myrobalan Rootstock and Blackthorn Inter-Stem

Milošević, Tomo; Milošević, Nebojša; Glišić, Ivan

doi:10.1007/s10341-014-0229-z

Cited by 22 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, in this way, rootstock contributes to proper vigor and productivity provided to the scion along with the efficiency in absorption and transportation of nutrients (Nawaz et al, 2016). The deficiency of Fe and Zn can be attributed to the antagonistic effect of P:Fe and Mg:Zn, as previously reported by (Milo sevi c et al, 2015). Malvi (2011) concluded that uptake of cationic micronutrients such as Fe and Mn can be reduced by an excess amount of P. A lower efficiency (in absorbing and translocating Zn) was also observed on some rootstocks (Table 3), which is in agreement with findings from Mayer et al (2015) and Reighard et al (2012).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 55%

Influence of Rootstocks on Leaf Mineral Content in the Subtropical Peach cv. UFSun

Shahkoomahally¹,

Chaparro²,

Beckman³

et al. 2020

horts

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The rootstock is an essential element for orchard management, influencing scion growth, nutrient concentration, and fruit quality. Seasonal variations in leaf nutrients of ‘UFSun’ grafted on five different rootstocks (‘Flordaguard’, ‘Barton’, ‘MP-29’, ‘P-22’, and ‘Okinawa’) were investigated during the 2017–18 growing season in Citra, FL. There was no significant variation in the macronutrient concentrations (N, P, K, Mg, Ca, and S) among different rootstocks; however, ‘UFSun’ on ‘Okinawa’ and ‘Flordaguard’ showed greater concentrations of Ca, K, and Mg concentration than other rootstocks. In contrast, ‘Flordaguard’ showed less potential to accumulate P as compared with other rootstocks. The Ca concentration was lowest in ‘MP-29’ and ‘Barton’ in April and June. The concentration of macronutrients (N, P, K, Mg, Ca, and S) in leaves was greater in April and October than in December and June. With respect to rootstocks, macronutrients in December and June were the highest in ‘Okinawa’ and the lowest in ‘Barton’. In April, the lowest concentration of macronutrient was recorded in ‘Barton’, whereas the highest concentrations were found in ‘P-22’, ‘Okinawa’, and ‘Flordaguard’. The highest leaf micronutrient concentrations were found in ‘MP-29’ and ‘Barton’, and the lowest in ‘Okinawa’ and ‘Flordaguard’ in June and October. For all rootstocks, concentrations of micronutrients increased between leaf growth in April and senescence in October. The micronutrient concentrations of leaves decreased during December. The widest dynamic changes during the vegetative cycle were found on ‘P-22’. Seasonal trends were more consistent for micronutrients than for macronutrients.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 55%

Influence of Rootstocks on Leaf Mineral Content in the Subtropical Peach cv. UFSun

Shahkoomahally¹,

Chaparro²,

Beckman³

et al. 2020

horts

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Leaf mineral analysis is a useful tool for the assessment of the nutritional status of crops (Johnson & Uriu, 1989;Montañés et al, 1993;Guo-yi et al, 2015), and the use of tolerant rootstocks would prevent nutritional disorders that cause high economic losses for the fruit growers (Jiménez et al, 2007;. In addition, rootstocks should improve other scion characteristics as cold tolerance or low chilling requirements, harvest date, internal and external fruit quality, yield and postharvest fruit quality (Castle, 1995;Remorini et al, 2008;Tavarini et al, 2011;Milošević et al, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It increased the interest in fruit quality traits, including nutritional value as an important factor relevant to human health (Wolfe et al, 2008;Byrne et al, 2012) and in utilizing dwarfing plum rootstocks, since they may decrease management costs, such as harvesting and pruning, and improve production efficiency (Moreno et al, 1994;Jiménez et al, 2011). However, soil properties and insufficient graft compatibility may limit the normal development of the cultivar, and consequently the agronomic and fruit quality characteristics (Moreno et al, 2001;Milošević et al, 2015). For this reason, the Experimental Station of Aula Dei (Zaragoza, Spain) started a breeding program of Prunus rootstocks aimed at obtaining new rootstocks best adapted to Mediterranean conditions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of plum rootstocks on agronomic performance, leaf mineral nutrition and fruit quality of ‘Catherina’ peach cultivar in heavy-calcareous soil conditions

Mestre

Reig

Aso

et al. 2017

Span. j. agric. res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The agronomic performance and leaf mineral nutrition of the non-melting clingstone peach cv. 'Catherina' was evaluated on seven hexaploid plum rootstocks, as well as one Prunus persica seedling. They were assessed over a period of 15 years in a field trial at the Experimental Station of Aula Dei-CSIC (Zaragoza, Spain), located in the Ebro Valley (NE Spain). Growing conditions generated varying levels of tree mortality, the highest with Constantí 1, Monpol and Montizo, whereas all Adesoto, GF 655/2 and PM 105 AD trees survived well. GF 655/2 and P. Soto 67 AD proved to be the most dwarfing rootstocks, while Constantí 1 and Monpol were the most invigorating and generated greater cumulative yields. However, the highest yield efficiency was recorded on GF 655/2 and Montizo, although they did not differ significantly from Adesoto and P. Soto 67 AD. The highest average values for fruit weight were observed on PM 105 AD and the lowest on GF 655/2, but they did not differ significantly from the rest of the rootstocks. The highest average values for the soluble solids content were observed on the Pollizo rootstocks Adesoto and PM 105 AD, followed by P. Soto 67 AD. All rootstocks induced nitrogen deficiency, with the exception of Constantí 1, GF 655/2 and Montizo, and iron deficiency, except PM 105 AD. The invigorating rootstock Constantí 1 seemed to induce higher SPAD values. According to the ΣDOP index, Montizo presented the most suitable balanced nutritional index, but it did not differ significantly from the rest of the rootstocks except GF 655/2 and P. Soto 67 AD.Additional key words: iron chlorosis; vigour; yield; SSC; SPAD.Correspondence should be addressed to María Angeles Moreno: mmoreno@eead.csic.es Authors' contributions: MAM has designed and conducted the study since 1997. LM collected samples and performed the leaf mineral, SPAD and fruit quality analysis. JAB supervised the leaf mineral analysis. MAM supervised the research and guided data interpretation. LM, GR and MAM carried out statistical analysis and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Competing interests:The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

show abstract

“…A linear correlation between TEAC and fumaric acid was also observed. Milosevic et al (2015) compared five cultivars on two rootstocks. They revealed that total antioxidant capacity ranged from 14.28 to 47.23 mg AA g -1 in Myrobolan and from 11.23 to 44.48 mg AA g -1 in Blackthorn inter-stem.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of rootstocks on phytochemical properties of apricot fruit

Gündoğdu¹

2019

Turk J Agric For

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The phytochemical influence of rootstocks on the Hacıhaliloğlu apricot cultivar was examined in this study. Myrobolan 29-C, Myrobolan GF-31, Marianna 2624, Pixy, and Tokaloğlu rootstocks were used and organic acid, sugars, vitamin C, total antioxidant capacity, and phenolic compounds were identified. The highest phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity were observed in Tokaloğlu rootstock. While Myrobolan GF-31 stood out in terms of organic acids and vitamin C, Pixy stood out in terms of sugar. The highest sugar content (sucrose) was recorded as 24.178 mg 100 g-1 in 'Pixy'. It was determined that Tokaloğlu rootstock had increased organic acid (1030.730 mg 100 g-1 malic acid), phenolic compounds (219.440 mg 100 g-1 chlorogenic acid), and antioxidant capacity (13.887 mg Trolox equivalent 100 g-1). Negative correlation was observed between malic acid and both glucose and sucrose. However, positive correlation was identified between catechin, chlorogenic, ferulic, and p-coumaric acid. Similarly, a linear correlation was identified between fumaric acid and antioxidant capacity. It was concluded that it would be more appropriate to use the Pixy and Tokaloğlu rootstocks in dry apricot cultivars and to use Myrobolan GF-31 and Tokaloğlu rootstocks in fresh apricot cultivars.

show abstract

Apricot Vegetative Growth, Tree Mortality, Productivity, Fruit Quality and Leaf Nutrient Composition as Affected by Myrobalan Rootstock and Blackthorn Inter-Stem

Cited by 22 publications

References 40 publications

Influence of Rootstocks on Leaf Mineral Content in the Subtropical Peach cv. UFSun

Influence of Rootstocks on Leaf Mineral Content in the Subtropical Peach cv. UFSun

Influence of plum rootstocks on agronomic performance, leaf mineral nutrition and fruit quality of ‘Catherina’ peach cultivar in heavy-calcareous soil conditions

Effect of rootstocks on phytochemical properties of apricot fruit

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About