2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-005-1917-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximation and Calibration of Nonlinear Structural Dynamics

Abstract: In this paper, a methodology for the calibration of nonlinear structural dynamic models is presented. Calibration of nonlinear structural dynamics offers several additional challenges beyond that of linear dynamics. Even with advanced computational power, exact nonlinear finite element simulations often take several hours to complete on engineering workstations. Thus, the proposed model calibration method utilizes an approximate structural model. This approximate analysis is embedded in the outer loop, which u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to a prerequisite library of models, the 'updated' model is, however, limited to a discrete set of models that are manually defined by the user, and consequently is of limited accuracy. Other MLbased methodologies aim at finding, online, the (global) parameter values corresponding to a measured signal (in a continuous domain) using, for example, iterative genetic algorithms [58,59]. In this case, however, the (genetic) search over the parameter space takes considerable computational effort, rendering real-time updating impossible [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to a prerequisite library of models, the 'updated' model is, however, limited to a discrete set of models that are manually defined by the user, and consequently is of limited accuracy. Other MLbased methodologies aim at finding, online, the (global) parameter values corresponding to a measured signal (in a continuous domain) using, for example, iterative genetic algorithms [58,59]. In this case, however, the (genetic) search over the parameter space takes considerable computational effort, rendering real-time updating impossible [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ANNs are renowned for their universal function approximation capabilities [54]. Moreover, in the online phase, inferring parameter values using ANNs is computationally efficient, as is also discussed in [51], where ANNs are used as surrogates for first-principles models.…”
Section: Inverse Mapping Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, since other generic function approximation algorithms may also be used to constitute IMMs, the authors prefer to refer to this methodology as the Inverse Mapping Parameter Updating (IMPU) method. For example, Zimmerman uses genetic algorithms [51]. Moreover, in recent work of the authors, Gaussian processes are used as IMMs, with the added benefit of enabling uncertainty quantification for the estimated parameter values [52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waszczyszyn and Ziemiański [110], for example, used several different NN architectures and evaluated their efficacy in several physical problems, such as calculating vibrational properties of buildings, and damage detection in beams. ANNs have also been used in structural dynamics [111,112] Another good example of material characterization is nanofluids: fluids that contain solid particles of nanometer-sized characteristic dimensions. Properties of nanofluids, such as thermal conductivity and viscosity, are complex functions of many different parameters, including temperature, particle size, and particle aggregation.…”
Section: Surrogate Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%