2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximating the Neyman–Pearson detector with 2C-SVMs. Application to radar detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[22] proposed multigene genetic programming-(MGGP-) based feature engineering was conducted to transform the cumulants of the received signals into highly discriminative features, and then, authors use a logistic regression classifier to achieve classification of overlapping signal modulation. [23] presented a study about the possibility of implementing approximations to the Neyman-Pearson (NP) detector with C-Support Vector Machines (C-SVM) and 2C-SVM. It was based on obtaining the functions that these learning machines approximate to after training to minimize the empirical risk, and on the possible implementation of the NP detector with these approximated functions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[22] proposed multigene genetic programming-(MGGP-) based feature engineering was conducted to transform the cumulants of the received signals into highly discriminative features, and then, authors use a logistic regression classifier to achieve classification of overlapping signal modulation. [23] presented a study about the possibility of implementing approximations to the Neyman-Pearson (NP) detector with C-Support Vector Machines (C-SVM) and 2C-SVM. It was based on obtaining the functions that these learning machines approximate to after training to minimize the empirical risk, and on the possible implementation of the NP detector with these approximated functions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…uses logistic regression to distinguish signals, and [23] uses SVM to achieve radar signal recognition. Our method is compared with these two machine learning algorithms.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Analysis Of Algorithms [22]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deep learning revolution has led many to apply machine learning methods to classical problems in all fields including statistics. Examples range from estimation [1][2][3][4][5][6] to detection [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Deep learning is a promising approach for deriving high accuracy and low complexity alternatives when classical solutions are intractable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important ingredient of these works is the use of an artificial training set where real noise data is augmented with synthetically planted targets. In the context of radar detection, SVMs were considered in [10]. Specific CFAR radar detectors were developed by relying on CFAR features [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is proved that the machine learning model using the minimum mean square error loss function could be used as the Neyman-Pearson (NP) criterion [34]. In [11], a cost-sensitive support vector machine (2C-SVM) is proposed, which is an SVM with different penalty factors for different classification categories. When processing the simulated signal of Swerling I and II target and additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) background, this detector has good performances when detecting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%