2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2003.00444.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximating prediction error covariances among additive genetic effects within animals in multiple‐trait and random regression models

Abstract: A method for approximating prediction error variances and covariances among estimates of individual animalsÕ genetic effects for multiple-trait and random regression models is described. These approximations are used to calculate the prediction error variances of linear functions of the terms in the model. In the multiple-trait case these are indexes of estimated breeding values, and for random regression models these are estimated breeding values at individual points on the longitudinal scale. Approximate rel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
94
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were used as validation criteria in the study by Su et al (2010). In conventional breeding value estimation (Misztal and Wiggans, 1988;Tier and Meyer, 2004), reliabilities of the estimated breeding values (EBVs) are also calculated from approximations of prediction error variances (PEVs) from the individual animal model solutions of genetic merit. Third, validation of the reliabilities of DGV for the group of the most recent bulls with EBV was used in the studies by Harris and Johnson (2010), Lund et al (2010) and VanRaden et al (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were used as validation criteria in the study by Su et al (2010). In conventional breeding value estimation (Misztal and Wiggans, 1988;Tier and Meyer, 2004), reliabilities of the estimated breeding values (EBVs) are also calculated from approximations of prediction error variances (PEVs) from the individual animal model solutions of genetic merit. Third, validation of the reliabilities of DGV for the group of the most recent bulls with EBV was used in the studies by Harris and Johnson (2010), Lund et al (2010) and VanRaden et al (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most genetic evaluation schemes, however, this matrix is too large to be inverted. Approximation procedures for the inverse and 'accuracies' of estimated breeding values for RR analyses have been described by and Tier & Meyer (2004).…”
Section: Estimation Of Breeding Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models present the advantage of using all records of the animal and of eliminating the need for the correction of weights for standard ages. In addition, it provides more accurate estimates of breeding values for any age within the interval of the records considered when compared with conventional multi-trait models (Tier and Meyer, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are difficulties to include adult weights in genetic evaluations because of the scarcity of weight records at later ages and the lack of adequate models to estimate (co)variance components at mature ages. Apparently, RRMs on B-spline functions offer advantages over the Legendre polynomials and the traditional finite dimensional models (Tier and Meyer, 2004) and could be used for genetic evaluation of growth traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%