2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2017.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate universal relations for neutron stars and quark stars

Abstract: Neutron stars and quark stars are ideal laboratories to study fundamental physics at supra nuclear densities and strong gravitational fields. Astrophysical observables, however, depend strongly on the star's internal structure, which is currently unknown due to uncertainties in the equation of state. Universal relations, however, exist among certain stellar observables that do not depend sensitively on the star's internal structure. One such set of relations is between the star's moment of inertia (I), its tid… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
363
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 353 publications
(415 citation statements)
references
References 452 publications
(875 reference statements)
33
363
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The different color maps correspond to different types of binaries with each EoS: 'HH" -two hadronic stars, "HQ" -one hadronic and one hybrid star, "QQ" -two hybrid stars. In all cases, purely hadronic binaries ("HH") have a radius bias of less than 500 m, which is consistent with the quoted systematic error in the EoS-insensitive relations [75,80]. This is most evident on the left panel for the purely hadronic DBHF EoS: all BNSs have a radius error of less than ∼ 0.4 km.…”
Section: Detectability Estimatessupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The different color maps correspond to different types of binaries with each EoS: 'HH" -two hadronic stars, "HQ" -one hadronic and one hybrid star, "QQ" -two hybrid stars. In all cases, purely hadronic binaries ("HH") have a radius bias of less than 500 m, which is consistent with the quoted systematic error in the EoS-insensitive relations [75,80]. This is most evident on the left panel for the purely hadronic DBHF EoS: all BNSs have a radius error of less than ∼ 0.4 km.…”
Section: Detectability Estimatessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The second relation expresses the compactness of a star as a function of its tidal deformability C i (Λ i ) [74] and can be used to compute the radius through R i = m i /C i (Λ i ). An improved fit with more data has been presented in [80] results of which are utilized in the following. In summary, we use the GW data to measure the component masses and the effective tidal deformability.…”
Section: Detectability Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the compactness of the solutions is a major component in our understanding of the phenomenon of scalarization [10,11], and compactness features prominently in various model-independent relations [28,29]. In particular, we have confirmed and extended the results of the universal I-C relations [30,31,22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Besides being directly related to gravitational-wave observations, the tidal deformability of compact stars has also been gaining a lot of attention because of the discovery of the universal I-Love-Q relations connecting the moment of inertia I, the tidal deformability λ (also called the Love number), and the spin-induced quadrupole moment Q [18,19] (see [20] for a review). In contrast to the massradius relation of compact stars, which depends sensitively on the EOS, the I-Love-Q relations are said to be universal because they are approximately EOS independent to about 1% level.…”
Section: Tidal Deformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%