2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-247x(03)00267-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate Rolle's theorems for the proximal subgradient and the generalized gradient

Abstract: AbstraetWe establish approximate Rolle's theorems for the proximal subgradient and for the generalized gradient We also show that an exact Rolle's theorem for the generalized gradient is completely false in all infinite-dimensional Banach spaces (even when they do not possess smooth bump functions),

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, these conditions, combined with the Ekeland principle, make it possible to show that the argmin0.1em$$ \mathrm{argmin}\kern0.1em $$ set of a studied functionals is nonempty, which leads to the existence of equilibria via Fermat's rule. A similar approach has been applied in case of infinite‐dimensional versions of another milestone result of analysis, that is, the Rolle theorem—see Azagra et al, 4 where the approximate Rolle theorem was established and de B e Silva and Teixeira, 5 where the Palais–Smale condition was employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, these conditions, combined with the Ekeland principle, make it possible to show that the argmin0.1em$$ \mathrm{argmin}\kern0.1em $$ set of a studied functionals is nonempty, which leads to the existence of equilibria via Fermat's rule. A similar approach has been applied in case of infinite‐dimensional versions of another milestone result of analysis, that is, the Rolle theorem—see Azagra et al, 4 where the approximate Rolle theorem was established and de B e Silva and Teixeira, 5 where the Palais–Smale condition was employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first time this implication was mentioned in [32] with a short proof. The opposite implication based on separable reduction was proved by Fabian [24,25] 4 . A short proof based on Theorem 9.8 follows.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%