2012
DOI: 10.1515/ana-2011-0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the theory of subdifferentials

Abstract: The theory presented in the paper consists of two parts. The first is devoted to basic concepts and principles such as the very concept of a subdifferential, trustworthiness and its characterizations, geometric consistence, fuzzy principles and calculus rules, methods of creation of new subdifferentials etc. In the second part we study certain specific subdifferentials, namely, subdifferentials associated with bornologies, their limiting versions and metric modifications. For each subdifferential we verify tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gsubdifferential, generalized gradient). We do not need a general definition here: an interested reader may look into [14]. The important point is that most of them can be effectively used only in certain classes of Banach spaces.…”
Section: ⊓ ⊔mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gsubdifferential, generalized gradient). We do not need a general definition here: an interested reader may look into [14]. The important point is that most of them can be effectively used only in certain classes of Banach spaces.…”
Section: ⊓ ⊔mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in [15], r S (f ) is denoted ∧ S (f ) (more or less as in [3]) and is called stabilized infimum; the usual infimum inf S f is declared robust when it is equal to r S (f ); a pointx achieving this value, i.e. f (x) = r S (f ), is called a robust minimizer (more or less as in [10]). In general, r S (f ) < inf S f for arbitrary lsc f : additional conditions (so-called qualification conditions) are required to have the equality r S (f ) = inf S f .…”
Section: Wijsman Convergence and Uniform Infimummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 3. Let f : X → R be as in (11), and in addition assume that for every i ∈ I the function f i is piecewise affine, i.e. ∂f (x).…”
Section: Exact Representations For Piecewise Affine Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%