2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate periodic solutions for the non-linear relativistic harmonic oscillator via differential transformation method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is very difficult to solve nonlinear problems and in general it is often more difficult to get an analytic approximation than a numerical one for a given nonlinear problem. To overcoming the shortcomings, many new analytical techniques have been successfully developed by diverse groups of mathematicians and physicists, such as, Perturbation Method [1], Homotopy Perturbation Method [2], Modified Homotopy Perturbation Method [3,4], Rational Homotopy Perturbation Method [5], He's Homotopy Perturbation Method [6], Modified He's homotopy Perturbation Method [7], Asymptotic Method [8][9][10][11], Optimal Iteration Perturbation Method [12], Generalization of Modified Differential Transforms Method [13][14][15][16], and so on. Several other authors used many powerful analytical methods in the field of approximate solutions especially for strongly nonlinear oscillators like Max-Min Approach Method [17,18], Algebraic Method [19], Parameter Expansion Method and Variational Iteration Method [20][21][22], Amplitude Frequency Formulation Method [23], Energy Balance Method [24,25], He's Energy Balance Method [26,27], Rational Energy Balance Method [28], Rational Harmonic Balance Method [29], Residue Harmonic Balance Method [30][31][32][33], Newton-harmonic Balancing Approach [34], and so on for solving NDEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is very difficult to solve nonlinear problems and in general it is often more difficult to get an analytic approximation than a numerical one for a given nonlinear problem. To overcoming the shortcomings, many new analytical techniques have been successfully developed by diverse groups of mathematicians and physicists, such as, Perturbation Method [1], Homotopy Perturbation Method [2], Modified Homotopy Perturbation Method [3,4], Rational Homotopy Perturbation Method [5], He's Homotopy Perturbation Method [6], Modified He's homotopy Perturbation Method [7], Asymptotic Method [8][9][10][11], Optimal Iteration Perturbation Method [12], Generalization of Modified Differential Transforms Method [13][14][15][16], and so on. Several other authors used many powerful analytical methods in the field of approximate solutions especially for strongly nonlinear oscillators like Max-Min Approach Method [17,18], Algebraic Method [19], Parameter Expansion Method and Variational Iteration Method [20][21][22], Amplitude Frequency Formulation Method [23], Energy Balance Method [24,25], He's Energy Balance Method [26,27], Rational Energy Balance Method [28], Rational Harmonic Balance Method [29], Residue Harmonic Balance Method [30][31][32][33], Newton-harmonic Balancing Approach [34], and so on for solving NDEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very difficult to solve nonlinear problems and in general it is often more difficult to get an analytic approximation than a numerical one for a given nonlinear problem. To overcoming the shortcomings, many new analytical techniques have been successfully developed by diverse groups of mathematicians and physicists, of Modified Differential Transforms Method [13][14][15][16], and so on. Several other authors used many powerful analytical methods in the field of approximate solutions especially for strongly nonlinear oscillators like Max-Min Approach Method [17,18], Algebraic Method [30-33], Newton-harmonic Balancing Approach [34], and so on for solving NDEs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this first example, we consider the particular case of (14) such that β = 0.1; this case was studied in [16] via differential transformation method (DTM) and also in [9] through the homotopy perturbation method (HPM). Good approximations were obtained in both works in comparison with the first known approximation solution of (14) obtained in [19] by the harmonic balance method (HBM).…”
Section: Application To the Relativistic Harmonic Oscillatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the numerical work was accomplished with the Mathematica software package. Example 2 In this second example, we consider the particular case of (14) such that β = 0.2; this case was studied in [16] via DTM and also in [9] using HPM. Once again, in both works, good approximations were found in comparison with the first obtained in (14) and the one obtained in [19] by HBM.…”
Section: Application To the Relativistic Harmonic Oscillatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due of this difficulty, most of the researchers in the applied and the engineering sciences directly resort to the numerical methods [1] or the numerical codes to solve their physical models. However, many other authors investigated their physical models by using one of the semi-analytical methods such as Adomian decomposition method (ADM) [2][3][4][5][6][7], differential transformation/Taylor method (DTM) [8][9], homotopy perturbation method (HPM) [10][11][12][13], and homotopy analysis method (HAM) [14]. Unfortunately, the accuracy of the numerical solutions derived from these semi-analytical methods cannot be checked without addressing the convergence issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%