2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2008.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate moment matrix decomposition in wavelet Galerkin BEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(27 reference statements)
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For p L = 1 and 0 = 0.1, the memory and total CPU time requirements scale almost linearly with the DOF. These observations are consistent with the results in, for example, [26,31]. Thus in the remainder of this section, we set p L = 1, = 0.4 and 0 = 0.1 for all computations, except for Example 5.2 in which we use 0 = 0.01.…”
Section: Effects Of the Governing Parameterssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For p L = 1 and 0 = 0.1, the memory and total CPU time requirements scale almost linearly with the DOF. These observations are consistent with the results in, for example, [26,31]. Thus in the remainder of this section, we set p L = 1, = 0.4 and 0 = 0.1 for all computations, except for Example 5.2 in which we use 0 = 0.01.…”
Section: Effects Of the Governing Parameterssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This result was derived in [31] for a large class of integral equations of the second kind, which includes the CECF. Our numerical experience indicates that a value of 0 in the interval [0.01, 0.1] performs well.…”
Section: Wavelet Constructionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations