2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2004.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approximate estimation of system reliability via fault trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Dutuit and A. Rauzy focuses on estimating the reliability of a system that is made up of both repairable and non-repairable components. Four algorithms are considered: the Murchland lower bound, the Barlow-Proschan lower bound, the Vesely full approximation and the Vesely asymptotic approximation, and the results are compared [19]. The fault tree is constructed by means of binary decision diagram (BDD) and it is presented on different examples.…”
Section: Low Accuracy Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dutuit and A. Rauzy focuses on estimating the reliability of a system that is made up of both repairable and non-repairable components. Four algorithms are considered: the Murchland lower bound, the Barlow-Proschan lower bound, the Vesely full approximation and the Vesely asymptotic approximation, and the results are compared [19]. The fault tree is constructed by means of binary decision diagram (BDD) and it is presented on different examples.…”
Section: Low Accuracy Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shalev and Tiran (2007) presented a new method for improved fault trees, reliability and safety calculations using condition-based fault tree analysis (CBFTA). Dutuit and Rauzy (2005) also used fault trees for approximate estimation of system reliability. Contini and Matuzas (2011) used functional decomposition for analysis of large fault trees.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comment. In many cases, there are also efficient analytical algorithms for computing the desired probability of the system's failure; see, e.g., [4][5][6]16]. …”
Section: Simplest Case: Component Failures Are Independent and Failurmentioning
confidence: 99%