Appropriation and Subversion

Abstract

Twenty-five years after the collapse of communism in Europe, few scholars disagree that the past continues to shape the democratic trajectories of postcommunist states. Precommunist education has featured prominently in this literature’s bundle of “good” legacies because it ostensibly helped foster resistance to communism. The authors propose a differentcausal mechanism—appropriation and subversion—that challenges the linearity of the above assumptions by analyzing the effects of precommunist literacy on patterns of Communist Party recruitment in Russia’s regions. Rather than regarding precommunist education as a source of latent resistance to communism, the authorshighlight the Leninist regime’s successful appropriation of the more literate strata of the precommunist orders, in the process subverting the past democratic edge of the hitherto comparatively more developed areas. The linear regression analysis of author—assembled statistics from the first Russian imperial census of 1897 supports prior research: precommunist literacy has a strong positive association with postcommunist democratic outcomes. Nevertheless, in pursuing causal mediation analysis, the authors find, in addition, that the above effect is mediated by Communist Party saturation in Russia’s regions. Party functionaries were likely to be drawn from areas that had been comparatively more literate in tsarist times, andparty saturation in turn had a dampening effect on the otherwise positive effects of precommunist education on postcommunist democracy.

Corruption and Trust in the European Union and National Institutions: Changes over the Great Recession across European States

“…This study, however, also pays attention to the importance of public opinion of states neighbouring the EU to account for existing research on the EU's impact on democratization, society, institutional development and even on freedom of mass media beyond the EU's Member States (Gawrich et al, 2010;Lankina et al, 2016b;Obydenkova, 2008Obydenkova, , 2012Schweickert et al, 2011). Here, the impact of national corruption on public opinion about 'distant' institutions might be ambiguous due to the influence of autocratic external factors and, more importantly, the role of historical legacies (Lankina et al, 2016a;Obydenkova, 2014, 2015;Obydenkova and Libman, 2012). Populations of non-EU Member States with high levels of national corruption might perceive 'distant' institutions as more transparent and honest.…”

Why Climate? The Drivers of the European Union’s Climate Governance in its Post-Soviet East European Neighbors

“…The focus is on the East European former Soviet republics (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine). The article builds on the growing Europeanization literature, the literature on historical legacies and "post-communism," as well as studies of democratic versus authoritarian regionalism (Beissinger 2002;Beissinger and Kotkin 2014;Lankina, Libman, and Obydenkova 2016b;Libman and Obydenkova 2013, 2018a, 2018bNazarov and Obydenkova 2020;Pop-Eleches and Tucker 2017). The EU's regional integration projects, such as the European Neighborhood Policy (ENP) or the Eastern Partnership (EaP), are fundamentally different from Russia's, for example the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) or the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS).…”

Global governance and Eurasian international organisations: lessons learned and future agenda

“…Finally, a set of studies connects the nature, development, and effects of Eurasian regional governance to a number of profound historical issues that make the Eurasian regionalism critically different from regional governance elsewhere in the world. The literature on historical legacies in general and on post-Communist legacies in particular, has been growing in the last decades to explain democratic development, attitudes, behavioural patterns (e.g., corruption), economic development (e.g., inequality, firm innovation, development of bank sector, foreign direct investment), the mass media, political discourse and even entertainment in Central European States and in the former Soviet republics (Beissinger, 2002;Beissinger & Kotkin, 2014;Lankina et al, 2016a;Libman & Obydenkova, 2019a, 2019bObydenkova & Libman, 2015;Pop-Eleches, 2007;Pop-Eleches & Tucker, 2013). Among other issues, these studies have also indicated at the persistence and survival of profound economic and social links, especially the channels of foreign trade created during the USSR and the importance of migration and lingua franca that survives due to the mass media in Russia as well as the use of cyber-space as an entertainment.…”