Global governance and Eurasian international organisations: lessons learned and future agenda

Libman, Alexander; Obydenkova, Anastassia

doi:10.1080/14631377.2020.1793587

Cited by 11 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 85 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…By contrast, posts on Facebook and Twitter are less vitriolic in their messaging, focusing more on what the EAEU has done and achieved. 85 An entire special issue was dedicated to the analysis of the nature, causes and implications of the interactions of autocracies-led IOs with other actors in the global economy and world politics (see Libman and Obydenkova 2021a;2021b;Izotov and Obydenkova 2021 for summary) this hypothesis. This can be seen in the AIIB and the EAEU copying from the EU's environmental agenda in documents of the EC and the ECB through three examples.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Environmental commitments and rhetoric over the Pandemic crisis: social media and legitimation of the AIIB, the EAEU, and the EU

Hall

Lenz

Obydenkova

2021

Post-Communist Economies

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Environmental commitments and rhetoric over the Pandemic crisis: social media and legitimation of the AIIB, the EAEU, and the EU

Hall

Lenz

Obydenkova

2021

Post-Communist Economies

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…LI emphasizes the role of intergovernmental bargaining and negotiations in shaping regional cooperation (Moravcsik & Schimmelfennig, 2018). The varying degrees of cooperation and conflict resolution among member states reflect the intergovernmental bargaining process (Libman & Obydenkova, 2021). LI highlights the influence of domestic political factors on a state's approach to regional integration (Moravcsik & Schimmelfennig, XX-XX 2018).…”

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamics of Regional Integration in Central Asia: A Case Study of Belt and Road Initiative

Saqib,

Naazer

2023

J. S. Asian Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In today’s globalized world, it has become a necessary norm to be part of a regional integration process for neighbouring countries in any region of the world. Central Asia is a good example to understand with its rich past and unexplored perspective. This phenomenon can be better understood by examining the quest of Central Asian republics (CARs) for regional integration and the role of BRI in this process. ‎For that, this paper explores the historical dynamics and drivers of regional integration in Central Asia with a special focus on the role of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) which aims to improve regional infrastructure, commerce, and investment, has the potential to redefine the direction of regional integration in Central Asia in the face of shifting global power dynamics. Furthermore, Liberal Intergovernmental theory helps explain the Central Asian Republics’ core actions and the impact of their domestic policies providing a details view of what drives regional integration in Central Asia. The study explores the historical dynamics and drivers of regional integration in Central Asia, focusing on the role of the BRI in reshaping these dynamics at domestic and external levels, using qualitative and thematic analysis of secondary sources.

show abstract

In our (frozen) backyard: the Eurasian Union and regional environmental governance in the Arctic

Hartwell

2023

Climatic Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Regional environmental governance has emerged as a viable alternative to supranational environmental solutions, using regional and local knowledge and actors to tailor more effective policies. This does not deny a role for supranational institutions, however, which can enable their members to effectively shift towards such a decentralized and polycentric approach. In specific regions such as the Arctic, with many national and local actors interested in environmental improvement, such impetus from meta-organizations (i.e., organizations comprised of organizations) could result in beneficial environmental outcomes. This paper examines an underutilized institution, the Eurasian Union (EaEU), and the role it currently plays in facilitating regional environmental governance. Focusing on its largest member, Russia—and the only member with an Arctic linkage—I explore the tension between supranational facilitation and interference in an area not directly affecting all members. Despite explicit Russian interest in this realm, the EaEU may be able to influence Russian environmental policy for the better via multilateral means and internal mechanisms. By challenging the Russian monopoly on Arctic policy in the EaEU, these additional voices may create space for environmental innovation in areas not central to Russia’s interests.

show abstract

Global governance and Eurasian international organisations: lessons learned and future agenda

Cited by 11 publications

References 85 publications

Environmental commitments and rhetoric over the Pandemic crisis: social media and legitimation of the AIIB, the EAEU, and the EU

Environmental commitments and rhetoric over the Pandemic crisis: social media and legitimation of the AIIB, the EAEU, and the EU

Dynamics of Regional Integration in Central Asia: A Case Study of Belt and Road Initiative

In our (frozen) backyard: the Eurasian Union and regional environmental governance in the Arctic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About