Appropriateness of Two Inventories Measuring Intuition (The Pid and the Rei) for Slovak Population

Mikušková, Eva Ballová; Hanák, Róbert; Čavojová, Vladimíra

doi:10.21909/sp.2015.01.674

Cited by 14 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 23 publications

(41 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In our study REI-40 was employed as an original and widely used instrument, also validated in other languages (e.g. Slovakian: Ballová Mikušková, Hanák, & Čavojová, 2015; Swedish: Björklund & Bäckström, 2008), although not previously validated in Serbian. We assumed that REI-40 is appropriate for our study design, but in order to further examine the possible predictors of the experiential dimension it is still recommended to do this separately for the three experiential dimension factors as criteria variables.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relating rational and experiential thinking styles with trait emotional intelligence in broader personality space

Jokić¹,

Purić

2019

Eur. J. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The usual distinction between rational and intuitive thinking styles is still a subject of scientific debate, as there is no consensus about their nature, mutual relations and relations to other personality constructs. Cognitive-experiential self-theory (CEST) proposes rational and experiential thinking styles as original personality constructs not fully explainable by five-factor personality models. Following CEST, we aimed to examine: 1. The uniqueness of rational and experiential dimensions by relating them to other personality constructs: trait emotional intelligence (TEI) and HEXACO; 2. Thinking style profiles defined through combined rational and experiential dimensions, and the possible role of TEI in understanding them. A total of 270 undergraduate students (82% females) completed the TEIQue-SF, REI-40, and HEXACO-PI-R. Our results showed that constructs from all three paradigms were low to moderately correlated to each other. TEI had incremental validity in explaining both rational and experiential dimensions, but large amounts of their variances remained unexplained by both TEI and HEXACO. We revealed four thinking style profiles defined through combined rational and experiential dimensions. TEI was the highest when both dimensions were high and the lowest when both were low, which could be related to processes of understanding and managing emotional functioning – proposed as an essential part of TEI, while within CEST they are seen as the way in which rationality influences experientiality. This finding might be of specific significance for understanding irrationality as not exclusively related to high intuition, but to low rationality as well.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relating rational and experiential thinking styles with trait emotional intelligence in broader personality space

Jokić¹,

Purić

2019

Eur. J. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While gender differences in thinking styles have been widely reported (Ballová Mikušková et al, 2015;Pacini & Epstein, 1999;Sladek et al, 2010), gender-dependent relationships have not been the primary object of interest in thinking styles research. Studies examining the associations of thinking styles with other variables almost always report only overall correlations and are not interested in possible gender-dependent patterns.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The preference for the rational or experiential way of thinking was measured by The Rational-Experiential Inventory (REI-40 - Pacini & Epstein, 1999;Ballová Mikušková et al, 2015), with 40 items divided into 20 items measuring rational and 20 items measuring experiential cognitive style. Both styles can be divided into ability (10 items) and engagement -reliance on and enjoyment of the selected mode of thinking (10 items).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This finding is probably related to the gender differences in thinking styles. Males have been reported to use the rational style more and the experiential style less in comparison to females across different ages in numerous studies worldwide (e.g., Norris & Epstein, 2011;Pacini & Epstein, 1999;Sladek, Bond, & Phillips, 2010) as well as in Slovakia (Ballová Mikušková, Hanák, & Čavojová, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Thinking Styles, Perceived Stress and Life Satisfaction

Bavoľár

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates the relationship between rational and experiential thinking styles, perceived stress and life satisfaction in university students. The research sample included 259 students (56.8% females, M age = 21.57) of psychology and informatics. Lower stress and higher life satisfaction are predominantly related to the thinking style preferred by the given genderthe rational style in males and the experiential style in females. More positive results in stress and life satisfaction were observed in the groups scoring higher in both styles compared to those scoring lower in both thinking styles. The relationships between thinking style preferred by the given gender and life satisfaction are mediated by the perceived stress. The present results indicate the possibility of increasing life satisfaction through changing information processing modes.

show abstract

“…This can suggest that professionals develop cognitive reflection skills in the course of their professional development. Although the results of Thoma et al (2015) do not imply that more experienced traders are more rational than less experienced ones, and the difference in CRT could occur by self-selection of more cognitively reflective individuals into the trading profession 1 , some preliminary results using self-reported rationality measures at least suggest that preference for rational engagement with tasks is related to age (Ballová Mikušková, Hanák, & Čavojová, 2015;Sladek, Bond, & Phillips, 2010). One can speculate that professional traders can differ from non-traders in numeracy and analytical cognitive style (related to CRT) because people choosing to be traders are more analytic, but the same line of argument is questionable in choosing a teaching profession.…”

mentioning

confidence: 85%

Comparison of experienced vs. novice teachers in cognitive reflection and rationality

Čavojová

Jurkovič²

2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Relatively little is known about actual cognitive skills and thinking dispositions of teachers, despite their possible importance. In the current paper we examined two predictions related to rational performance of teachers. First, we expected that more experienced teachers have more rational thinking dispositions, are more cognitively reflective and discount the future less in comparison to novice teachers. Second, we expected that cognitive reflection is related to options involving more patience. 109 novice teachers (undergraduate students) and 55 experienced teachers participated in the study. Thinking dispositions were measured by RationalExperiential Inventory, cognitive reflection was measured by CRT, to measure future discounting we used intertemporal choice tasks and Consideration for Future Consequences questionnaire. We found that teachers differed significantly from undergraduate students in CRT and all subscales of these measures in the expected direction, with the exception of CFC-Immediate and REI-Experiential Engagement, but we found no significant differences between teachers and students (with one exception) on intertemporal choice tasks. The results also confirmed the expected relationships between CRT, CFC and REI. These results pose some important implications for educating future teachers.

show abstract

Appropriateness of Two Inventories Measuring Intuition (The Pid and the Rei) for Slovak Population

Cited by 14 publications

References 23 publications

Relating rational and experiential thinking styles with trait emotional intelligence in broader personality space

Relating rational and experiential thinking styles with trait emotional intelligence in broader personality space

Thinking Styles, Perceived Stress and Life Satisfaction

Comparison of experienced vs. novice teachers in cognitive reflection and rationality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About