2020
DOI: 10.23736/s1973-9087.20.06148-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appropriateness of admission to rehabilitation: definition of a set of criteria and rules through the application of the Delphi method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparators were also heterogeneous among studies, indicating a need for greater standardization. Scientific Societies could encourage discussions on these topics, even promoting the use of evidence-based methodologies in order to reach an agreement among experts, such as the Delphi Panels and the Consensus Conferences ( 71 , 72 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparators were also heterogeneous among studies, indicating a need for greater standardization. Scientific Societies could encourage discussions on these topics, even promoting the use of evidence-based methodologies in order to reach an agreement among experts, such as the Delphi Panels and the Consensus Conferences ( 71 , 72 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more recent paper published in 2020 by Merlo et al . 7 proposed new admission criteria for inpatient rehabilitation, based on expert advice by 53 healthcare professionals in the rehabilitation field in Italy. Three pillars mentioned as driving goals for appropriateness were: improvement in healthcare quality, cost saving and system sustainability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The responses would be combined, analysed, and presented back to the panel of experts for further comment [ 13 , 14 ]. This process would be repeated until consensus was reached between most of the panel members, with the responses shifting towards the same ideas, thus suggesting stable results [ 11 ]. This Delphi study was completed over a total of four rounds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anonymity was crucial in ensuring an equal opportunity for each panellist to express their views, unconditioned by the identities or reactions of other panellists. Each panellist response had the same weighting score and was given equal importance at data analysis stage [ 11 , 16 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation