2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appropriate vegetation indices for measuring the impacts of deer on forest ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Readers are referred to some more specifics of the discussion for the restoration of firs and other tree species carried out at many forests of the world (Hester et al 2000, Kay and Bartos 2000, Halpern 2001, Takahashi et al 2001, Narukawa and Yamamoto 2002, Ito and Hino 2004, Taylor et al 2004, Dobrowolska 2008, Doležal et al 2009, Pellerin et al 2010, Nagaike et al 2014, Bottero et al 2015. It is worth to pay due attention to measure appropriate vegetation indices on forest ecosystems impacted by deer (Iijima and Nagaike 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readers are referred to some more specifics of the discussion for the restoration of firs and other tree species carried out at many forests of the world (Hester et al 2000, Kay and Bartos 2000, Halpern 2001, Takahashi et al 2001, Narukawa and Yamamoto 2002, Ito and Hino 2004, Taylor et al 2004, Dobrowolska 2008, Doležal et al 2009, Pellerin et al 2010, Nagaike et al 2014, Bottero et al 2015. It is worth to pay due attention to measure appropriate vegetation indices on forest ecosystems impacted by deer (Iijima and Nagaike 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase of deer density has been shown to result in more prevalent debarking of trees (Akashi and Nakashizuka 1999;Nagaike and Hayashi 2003;Iijima and Nagaike 2015) and browsing of saplings and understory vegetation (Gill and Beardall 2001;Beguin et al 2009;Suzuki et al 2013) in forests. To deal with the overabundance of deer and its effect on forest ecosystems, control of nuisance deer and the construction of fences to protect vegetation have been conducted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debarking was shown to depend on the size of trees (e.g., Nagaike and Hayashi 2003;Koda and Fujita 2011;Borkowski and Ukalski 2012), their species (e.g., Kay 1993;Akashi and Nakashizuka 1999;Moore et al 1999;Takeuchi et al 2011), proportion of coniferous stands (Ligot et al 2013), the distance from forest road (McLaren et al 2000), and snow depth (Iijima and Nagaike 2015). In addition to these factors, spatial variation of deer impact was observed in lower elevation forests: the higher the deer density, the higher the proportion of debarked trees (Iijima and Nagaike 2015) and browsed saplings (Akashi et al 2011) and the lower the sapling density (Beguin et al 2009). The spatial variation of deer density across low-elevation areas was explained by the presence of attractive habitat (e.g., artificial grassland; Kamei et al 2010;Iijima et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also paralleled in Japan: sika deer (Cervus nippon Temminck) is the major 52 inhibitor of forest regeneration (Takatsuki, 2009;Iijima and Nagaike, 2015). However,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%