IEEE SMC'99 Conference Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.99CH37028)
DOI: 10.1109/icsmc.1999.825348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaching evolutionary robotics through population-based incremental learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of the ER work to date used very simple network topologies and restricted weight values [11,40,50,52]. Such restrictions limit the scalability of the methods studied.…”
Section: The Evolutionary Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Much of the ER work to date used very simple network topologies and restricted weight values [11,40,50,52]. Such restrictions limit the scalability of the methods studied.…”
Section: The Evolutionary Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…PBIL belongs to the family of Estimation of Distribution Algorithms (EDAs), which use the probability (or prototype) vector (PV) to generate sample solutions. There is no crossover operator in PBIL; instead a single probability vector is updated using solution with the highest fitness values [16]. Initially, the values of the probability vector are set to 0.5 to ensure that the probability of generating 0 or 1 is equal.…”
Section: Overview Of Population-based Incremental Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PBIL is simpler and more effective than GAs. In addition PBIL has less overhead than GAs [15]- [16]. There are few parameters to tune in PBIL as compared to GAs or PSO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main benefits of PBIL over traditional evolutionary algorithm approaches are (1) lowered memory requirements (since the population does not needed to be stored); (2) increasing the sample size has no effect on memory (versus increasing population size); and (3) typically a lowered computational cost (mainly because of not employing genetic operators) [22]. Nevertheless, PBIL (and generally EDAs) still suffer from issues of diversity loss, as described in [2,20,36], and so methods which improve diversity should be of importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, for large disturbances in conditions PBIL is shown to outperform a genetic algorithm ap-proach. An initial investigation into the use of PBIL for evolutionary robotics was given in [22]. The proposed Floating Point PBIL is able to handle floating point results and is shown to outperform a traditional genetic algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%