2015
DOI: 10.1179/0027773814z.000000000103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Approaches to Research in Toponymy

Abstract: There are two basic ways to conduct toponymic research — one concentrating on the etymology, meaning, and origin of toponyms, and one focusing on the toponyms of a region and examining patterns of these names. Usually, this distinction is not explicitly recognized. This paper considers the differences between the two approaches and proposes guidelines for their use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
16

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
28
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Another goal was to elucidate the spatial distribution and make informed assertions concerning the spatial patterns and the semantic relationships of oikonyms with the real-life characteristics of the environment. We strongly support the statement by Jan Tent about the possibilities of extensive (geographic) research in toponymy (Tent, 2015), and share his observation that, although digital toponymy data sources are widely available and research itself is 'more straightforward to conduct' than intensive (etymological) research, only a small part of toponymic studies that actually exist are by their very nature extensive. Extensive studies often focus on the relationship between toponyms and the natural (landscape) elements (Capra, Ganga, Filzmoser, Gaviano, & Vacca, 2016;Cox, Maehr, & Larkin, 2002;Derungs, Wartmann, Purves, & Mark, 2013;Shi, Ren, Du, & Gao, 2015;Tucci et al, 2011).…”
Section: Project Goal and Related Worksupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another goal was to elucidate the spatial distribution and make informed assertions concerning the spatial patterns and the semantic relationships of oikonyms with the real-life characteristics of the environment. We strongly support the statement by Jan Tent about the possibilities of extensive (geographic) research in toponymy (Tent, 2015), and share his observation that, although digital toponymy data sources are widely available and research itself is 'more straightforward to conduct' than intensive (etymological) research, only a small part of toponymic studies that actually exist are by their very nature extensive. Extensive studies often focus on the relationship between toponyms and the natural (landscape) elements (Capra, Ganga, Filzmoser, Gaviano, & Vacca, 2016;Cox, Maehr, & Larkin, 2002;Derungs, Wartmann, Purves, & Mark, 2013;Shi, Ren, Du, & Gao, 2015;Tucci et al, 2011).…”
Section: Project Goal and Related Worksupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The same question can be raised concerning the distribution of particular toponymic species at present and in the past. Indeed, if 'place names function as independent variables which can be tested against dependent variables … ' (Tent, 2015), the research would be possible and could potentially yield valid results.…”
Section: Project Goal and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographical names contain necessary information of location. In addition to that, geographical names also allot to attributive information toward the correlated spatial data (Tent, 2015). With the enlargement of study in association with place names critically (Vuolteenaho & Berg, 2009), without a doubt, they do not merely act as an information contributor on just the physical background but the anthropological factor as well.…”
Section: The Trend Of Geographical Names Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of study on the place names of the Lion City has to be necessarily intensive and qualitative [24] (pp. [65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74], and requires a deep analysis of the selected toponyms both at the linguistic and historical level.…”
Section: Sequent Occupance and Diachronic Coexistence In Singapore Tomentioning
confidence: 99%