Approaches for integrated assessment of ecological and eutrophication status of surface waters in Nordic Countries

Abstract

We review approaches and tools currently used in Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden) for integrated assessment of 'ecological status' sensu the EU Water Framework Directive as well as assessment of 'eutrophication status' in coastal and marine waters. Integration principles for combining indicators within biological quality elements (BQEs) and combining BQEs into a final-integrated assessment are discussed. Specific focus has been put on combining different types of information into indices, since several methods are currently employed. As a consequence of the variety of methods used, comparisons across both BQEs and water categories (river, lakes and coastal waters) can be difficult. Based on our analyses, we conclude that some principles and methods for integration can be critical and that a harmonised approach should be developed. Further, we conclude that the integration principles applied within BQEs are critical and in need of harmonisation if we want a better understanding of potential transition in ecological status between surface water types, e.g. when riverine water enters a downstream lake or coastal water body.

The Diatom/Dinoflagellate Index as an Indicator of Ecosystem Changes in the Baltic Sea 1. Principle and Handling Instruction

“…For assessing the environmental status, all essential components of the ecosystem have to be considered in a holistic way (Ferreira et al, 2011;Borja et al, 2014Borja et al, , 2016Andersen et al, 2016). A holistic assessment of the Baltic Sea (HOLAS II) is planned in 2018 after the first assessment has been published already in 2010 (HELCOM, 2010).…”

A Fusion Water Quality Soft-Sensing Method Based on WASP Model and Its Application in Water Eutrophication Evaluation

“…As the eutrophication mechanism is complex, scholars often choose different evaluation criteria to assess water quality status. By referring to [35,36], five levels are classified to describe the eutrophication condition: I (none), II (mild), III (medium), IV (heavy), and V (extremely heavy); namely, = {I, II, III, IV, V}.…”

Biodiversity and ecosystem services in Nordic coastal ecosystems: an IPBES-like assessment. Volume 1. The general overview.

“…In the Helgeland area on the northwest coast of Norway, transportation of nutrients by sea currents from western Europe may be causing eutrophication (Andersen et al, 2016. The response of seagrass ecosystems to coastal nutrient enrichment has shown to follow a "threshold pattern".…”