1998
DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.5.9708118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Appraising Pulmonary Edema Using Supine Chest Roentgenograms in Ventilated Patients

Abstract: The role of portable, anteroposterior, supine chest X-rays (CXRs) in distinguishing hydrostatic pulmonary edema (HPE) from permeability pulmonary edema (PPE) in mechanically ventilated patients is controversial. We prospectively obtained and evaluated such CXRs in 33 supine, mechanically ventilated intensive-care-unit patients with pulmonary artery catheters. Three chest radiologists independently reviewed CXRs without clinical information and recorded the cardiothoracic (CT) ratio, vascular pedicle width (VPW… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These included pulmonary edema (nϭ61; 74% of all complications, overt congestive heart failure, nϭ7). Pulmonary edema was diagnosed by chest X-ray according to previously published standardized criteria (24,25), whereas congestive heart failure was identified as clinically significant presence of dyspnea at rest, tachypnea, tachycardia, severe hypoxemia, and rales or wheezing (24).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These included pulmonary edema (nϭ61; 74% of all complications, overt congestive heart failure, nϭ7). Pulmonary edema was diagnosed by chest X-ray according to previously published standardized criteria (24,25), whereas congestive heart failure was identified as clinically significant presence of dyspnea at rest, tachypnea, tachycardia, severe hypoxemia, and rales or wheezing (24).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classically, pulmonary edema is classified as hydrostatic or permeability-type edema (25). The distinction is difficult and most cases are usually considered to be mixed-cause.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This distinction is unreliable if based solely on radiographic findings. 14 In this study, we differentiated between hydrostatic and permeability pulmonary edema on the basis of hemodynamic assessment using the cutoff criteria recommended by the American-European Consensus Conference. 11 This distinction is arbitrary, and in critically ill patients there is frequently no pure hydrostatic or permeability pulmonary edema.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1984, Milne and co-workers [4] measured vascular pedicle width (VPW), which represents the mediastinal silhouette of the great vessels on chest X-rays (CXR), to evaluate the intravascular volume status, and similar studies [5,6,7] of VPW have been reported so far. According to these studies [4,5,6,7], VPW is correlated with intravascular volume status and is significantly larger in patients with volume overload.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to these studies [4,5,6,7], VPW is correlated with intravascular volume status and is significantly larger in patients with volume overload. In addition, Ely et al [7] suggested that VPW also correlates with intravascular pressure indicated by pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and distinguishes cardiogenic from non-cardiogenic lung edema.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%