IMPORTANCEWhether intravenous thrombolysis is needed in combination with mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute large vessel occlusion stroke is unclear.OBJECTIVE To examine whether mechanical thrombectomy alone is noninferior to combined intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy for favorable poststroke outcome. Investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority clinical trial in 204 patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion enrolled at 23 hospital networks in DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

BackgroundEndovascular therapy has been shown to be effective in patients with acute cerebral large‐vessel occlusion, but real‐world efficacies are unknown.Methods and ResultsWe conducted a prospective registry at 46 centers between October 2014 and January 2017. Eligible patients were those who were aged 20 years or older, with acute cerebral large‐vessel occlusion, and who were hospitalized within 24 hours of the onset. We enrolled both consecutive patients who were treated with or without endovascular therapy. Endovascular therapy included thrombectomy, balloon angioplasty, stenting, local fibrinolysis, and piercing. The primary outcome was a favorable outcome as defined by a modified Rankin Scale of 0 to 2 at 90 days after onset. Secondary outcomes were modified Rankin Scale of 0 to 1 and mortality. Safety outcomes were intracerebral hemorrhage or a recurrence of ischemic stroke. We constructed the 2242 (1121 each) propensity score–matched patients cohort based on a propensity score for endovascular therapy and estimated the adjusted odds ratio, followed by sensitivity analyses on original 2399 (1278 in endovascular therapy versus 1121 in no endovascular therapy) patients. In the propensity score–matched cohort, favorable outcomes were observed in 35.3% and 30.7% of patients in the endovascular therapy and no endovascular therapy groups, respectively (P=0.02). The adjusted odds ratio for the favorable outcome was 1.44 (95% confidence interval, 1.10–1.86, P=0.007). The efficacy of endovascular therapy in achieving favorable outcomes did not differ between our subgroups and in the sensitivity analyses.ConclusionsEndovascular therapy decreased disabilities at 90 days in real‐world patients with acute cerebral large‐vessel occlusion.Clinical Trial RegistrationURL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02419794.

Extension of in vivo nucleic acid transfection techniques and increased information about those transfection properties and side effects are urgently needed to advance biological research and drug therapy. Tissue pressure-mediated transfection, involving lightly pressing the target tissue after intravenous injection of plasmid DNA or small-interfering RNA (siRNA), is a promising approach because of its high transfection efficiency and resulting low tissue damage. In this study, the gene expression/silencing properties and proinflammatory cytokine production associated with tissue pressure-mediated transfection were evaluated to extend its application. We have found that tissue pressure-mediated transfection can be applied to plasmid DNA and siRNA transfection to the spleen and siRNA transfection to the liver. In addition, we have demonstrated that these methods induce little production of proinflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-12, and interferon-gamma. Moreover, we succeeded in controlling and quantifying the degree of pressure on the spleen and kidney and found that 0.59 N/cm(2) is sufficient for efficient and highly reproducible plasmid DNA transfection to the spleen and kidney in mice. Tissue pressure-mediated transfection of the kidney, liver, and spleen exhibits well-balanced characteristics including (1) simple and convenient manipulation, (2) tissue-specific, effective broad transfection properties, and (3) a low inflammatory response. Therefore, this information could be useful for a molecular-level mechanism analysis of diseases at an individual level in mammals, exploration of therapeutic target molecules and evaluation of gene therapy and nucleic acid-based therapy approaches, as well as potential clinical applications.

Rationale Bridging therapy with endovascular therapy (EVT) and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) has been reported to improve outcomes for acute stroke patients with large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation. While the IVT may increase the reperfusion rate, the risk of hemorrhagic complications increases. Whether EVT without IVT (direct EVT) is equally effective as bridging therapy in acute stroke remains unclear. Aim This randomized study of endovascular therapy with versus without intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute stroke with ICA and M1 occlusion aims to clarify the efficacy and safety of direct EVT compared with bridging therapy. Methods and design This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-treatment, blinded-endpoint clinical trial. The target patient number is 200, comprising 100 patients receiving direct EVT and 100 receiving bridging therapy. Study outcome The primary efficacy endpoint is a modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2 at 90 days. Safety outcome measures are any intracranial hemorrhage at 24 h. Discussion This trial may help determine whether direct EVT should be recommended as a routine clinical strategy for ischemic stroke patients within 4.5 h from onset. Direct EVT would then become the choice of therapy in stroke centers with endovascular facilities. Trial registration UMIN000021488.