2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying the Tiers of Assessment: A Holistic and Systematic Approach to Assessing Library Collections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While quantitative findings, such as usage statistics, present a seemingly direct and efficient way for research libraries to justify their collections amid ever-shifting technologies and budget constraints, and formal evaluation strategies help circumvent the labor-intensive process of reviewing collections using an item-by-item approach (referred to as the Conspectus method), exclusively quantitative systematic approaches fail due to their one-dimensionality when evaluating collecting institutions such as museum library networks. 2 Without discrediting the utility of quantitative tools, this study demonstrates that relying on them solely overlooks what exists at a micro-level, such as the quality of a collection's holdings, or weaknesses therein. 3 On their own, circulation statistics and checklists are ill equipped to assess collection omissions as they tend to focus on the number and use of items that encourage uniformity and overlook inter-unit distinctions.…”
Section: Notes On Operationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…While quantitative findings, such as usage statistics, present a seemingly direct and efficient way for research libraries to justify their collections amid ever-shifting technologies and budget constraints, and formal evaluation strategies help circumvent the labor-intensive process of reviewing collections using an item-by-item approach (referred to as the Conspectus method), exclusively quantitative systematic approaches fail due to their one-dimensionality when evaluating collecting institutions such as museum library networks. 2 Without discrediting the utility of quantitative tools, this study demonstrates that relying on them solely overlooks what exists at a micro-level, such as the quality of a collection's holdings, or weaknesses therein. 3 On their own, circulation statistics and checklists are ill equipped to assess collection omissions as they tend to focus on the number and use of items that encourage uniformity and overlook inter-unit distinctions.…”
Section: Notes On Operationsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Libraries. A full-time staff position was hired to support a comprehensive collection assessment program to measure progress toward achieving Carnegie Very High Research classificationpart of the university's strategic plan (Kelly, 2014). This assessment program also included multiple methods of measurement and addressed sections of the library collection by subject area.…”
Section: Institutional Goals Also Guided a Collection Evaluation Pilomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assessment program also included multiple methods of measurement and addressed sections of the library collection by subject area. While input from all stakeholders was included during the planning of this pilot, this project was unique in that it was to be maintained by one staff position with ideally limited workload overflow to other library staff after the initial program development (Kelly, 2014).…”
Section: Institutional Goals Also Guided a Collection Evaluation Pilomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…En esta época de rápidos cambios tecnológicos y presión presupuestaria, las bibliotecas deben justificar sus colecciones, asegurarse de su pertinencia y canalizar convenientemente el gasto en adquisiciones. Para ello es indispensable llevar a cabo estos procedimientos de evaluación (Kelly, 2014). Una vez más, la abundancia de artículos sobre el tema en la bibliografía internacional demuestra que la inquietud ha sido generalizada.…”
Section: Cambios En La Selección Y Evaluaciónunclassified