2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2019.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying the lazy user theory to understand the motivations for choosing carpooling over public transport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings revealed that psychological dimensions, such as attitude towards carpooling, enjoyment of being sociable, trust in other people, environmentalist identity and the role of the family circle and peer group, are more influential than classical socio-demographic, economic and spatial variables [38][39][40][41][42]. Cultural elements, such as car culture [43], also play a role in explaining carpooling behaviour, but they were far less investigated [44]. In addition, the influence of several classical variables on carpooling intention or practice, such as gender and the characteristics of the place of residence (density, urban versus rural), is still disputed as shown by the two most recent meta-analyses on the topic [7,18].…”
Section: Brief Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings revealed that psychological dimensions, such as attitude towards carpooling, enjoyment of being sociable, trust in other people, environmentalist identity and the role of the family circle and peer group, are more influential than classical socio-demographic, economic and spatial variables [38][39][40][41][42]. Cultural elements, such as car culture [43], also play a role in explaining carpooling behaviour, but they were far less investigated [44]. In addition, the influence of several classical variables on carpooling intention or practice, such as gender and the characteristics of the place of residence (density, urban versus rural), is still disputed as shown by the two most recent meta-analyses on the topic [7,18].…”
Section: Brief Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this service is also seen as a potential solution to reduce the number of cars or vehicles on the roads, which further leads to savings in energy consumption and the reduced level of greenhouse gas emissions (Wang et al, 2020). Earlier studies focussing on the driver's intention to use the sharing mobility reported that the perceived enjoyment, sustainability, technology embracement, variety seeking, comfort and flexibility were the major common motives (Pinto, Vieira, Carvalho, & Sugano, 2019;Alemi et al, 2018;Fleury, Tom, Jamet, & Colas-Maheux, 2017). In addition, sharing mobility allows the commuters to experience diverse choices, community interaction and social interaction (Hwang & Griffiths, 2017).…”
Section: Research Model and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scientific community has been evaluating carpooling impacts on road transportation and since this commuting approach has shown positive results, the assessment of the reasons that make people carpool and methodologies to control carpooling platforms have been explored [1,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Results suggest that the process should be as simple as possible so that more people consider themselves to be able to start carpooling [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adopting a lazy user theory, Pinto et al [10] developed a theoretical model that was used to understand the motivations that make people choose carpooling over public transportation when commuting from/to a university campus [10]. Results presented two main reasons to choose carpooling: (1) carpooling drops commuters closer to their destination; and (2) the waiting time for carpooling is considerably lower [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%