1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1743(199903/04)16:2<107::aid-sres278>3.0.co;2-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying systems thinking to higher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond the focus on the individual teacher we also have the rhetoric of organisational change, perhaps best expressed by Fullan: The answer to large-scale reform is not to try to emulate the characteristics of the minority who are getting somewhere under present conditions … Rather, we must change existing conditions so that it is normal and possible for a majority of people to move forward. (2001,268) This awareness of the role of organisational change is not recent, with the need to go beyond the pedagogy and technology to consider organisational aspects (Bates 2001;Ryan et al 2000), leadership (Hanna 1998;Reid 1999) and systems (Ison 1999;Laurillard 1997Laurillard , 1999Peters 1999) recognised. Those leading change in universities need to balance technological, academic and administrative concerns (Jones 2003;McCarthy and Samors 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the focus on the individual teacher we also have the rhetoric of organisational change, perhaps best expressed by Fullan: The answer to large-scale reform is not to try to emulate the characteristics of the minority who are getting somewhere under present conditions … Rather, we must change existing conditions so that it is normal and possible for a majority of people to move forward. (2001,268) This awareness of the role of organisational change is not recent, with the need to go beyond the pedagogy and technology to consider organisational aspects (Bates 2001;Ryan et al 2000), leadership (Hanna 1998;Reid 1999) and systems (Ison 1999;Laurillard 1997Laurillard , 1999Peters 1999) recognised. Those leading change in universities need to balance technological, academic and administrative concerns (Jones 2003;McCarthy and Samors 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But every system management, including teaching is a cybernetic process and has to follow systemic principles [23]. Only a systemic behavior (holism based on inter-disciplinary cooperation, synergies, not only sums result) is the essence of a systemic-cybernetic approach, to make bridges between the traditional sciences [14,24] to struggle against 'oneminded over-specialization' [18,25]. 'Systems theory fights the exaggerated specialization, because the latter causes too many oversights and put the humankind in danger' (Ludwig von Bertalanffy, 1968).…”
Section: With: An Integrative and Applied Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, above all, the attribution of significance by teachers is the most promising leverage to foster the adoption of systems thinking in classrooms [45]. [8,24].…”
Section: When? Where? Who? and How?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That academics are increasingly expected to have a 'theory of learning' is representative not only of a shift in focus in higher education, but of a series of changes throughout the sector which can be described as producing a major systems reconfiguration (Ison, 1999(Ison, , 2000. Within this context, and from a systems perspective, understanding how students learn can be considered to be central to designing environments to support student learning -whether those environments be social (e.g.…”
Section: Purpose and Rationale Of The Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%