2018
DOI: 10.5424/fs/2018271-12658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applying quantitative structure models to plot-based terrestrial laser data to assess dendrometric parameters in dense mixed forests

Abstract: Aim of study: To assess terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) accuracy in estimating biometrical forest parameters at plot-based level in order to replace manual survey for forest inventory purposes.Area of study: Monte Morello, Tuscany region, ItalyMaterial and methods: In 14 plots (10 m radius) in dense Mediterranean mixed conifer forests, diameter at breast height (DBH) and height were measured in Summer 2016. Tree volume was computed using the second Italian National Forest Inventory (INFC II) equations. TLS da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, QSM is generally more accurate in estimating coarse wood volume in leaf-off broadleaves than conifers, due to less occlusion by foliage. Similar differences in accuracy across forest types and species were observed by Torresan et al (2018) and Demol et al (2021bDemol et al ( , 2022a. In our case, the reference data quality might play an additional role in the differences in QSM accuracy, as broadleaf trees were more susceptible to damage during harvesting and weighing operations than conifers.…”
Section: Tree Volume Estimation Using 3d Reconstructionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Also, QSM is generally more accurate in estimating coarse wood volume in leaf-off broadleaves than conifers, due to less occlusion by foliage. Similar differences in accuracy across forest types and species were observed by Torresan et al (2018) and Demol et al (2021bDemol et al ( , 2022a. In our case, the reference data quality might play an additional role in the differences in QSM accuracy, as broadleaf trees were more susceptible to damage during harvesting and weighing operations than conifers.…”
Section: Tree Volume Estimation Using 3d Reconstructionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In addition, the height of the understory shrub vegetation in the plots was less than 1.5 m, so the shrub point cloud data in the plot was removed. Third, in order to make the volume of the reconstructed trunks more similar to the volume of the real trees, the noise and outliers were removed from the data, since these could result in the fitting of wrong cylinder models and overestimating the trunk volume [28,33]. A sphere with a radius of 0.3 cm was used to filter noise points in cloud data of plots while removing outliers.…”
Section: Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TH is one of the tree components that most signifi cantly contribute to the stem volume, and it was therefore expected that stem volume would show a trend similar to that of TH (Torresan et al, 2018). In addition, considering the stem tapering pattern, larger diameters are closer to the target height, which culminates in smaller incidence angles (Buck, 2017;Almeida, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%